Re: Under The Hood Question
Outatime wrote:
> > Mike Romain wrote: > > So I take it neither of you two jokers have ever been in an accident? > > > > ---- happens and you two are waaaaayyyyy out in left field attacking > > some poor guy with 'No' facts at hand.... > > > > Talk about a pair of losers.... > > I disagree, Mike. Fact: a woman rear-ends another vehicle. This moron > suggests she retain a lawyer to fend off collection efforts. I think > this is scuzzy behavior, and anyone who defends it is way off base. > > Ten years ago in Sacramento, a female doctor with a blood alcohol level > exceeding 0.20 drives up the wrong way onto a freeway offramp, hitting a > car head-on, killing all 4 kids inside. All 4 families file wrongful > death suits, and rightfully so. She lawyers up, waits until all 4 have > filed, then drops a Chapter 7 on the whole mess and WALKS AWAY like > nothing ever happened. Truly the pinnacle of scuzzy behavior. > > I've never been charged with causing an accident. I've been on the > butt-end of several, and every single time, the clod who caused it tries > his/her damndest to snake out of their financial responsibility. The > last moron who did this ended up facing me in Superior Court; I took his > condo, car, and his 401-k to satisfy the judgement. (No, he didn't feel > the need to bother carrying liability insurance.) > > So, don't preach to me about '---- happens.' I want to see someone > giddy with apology while pulling out the checkbook to take care of the > damages for a change, instead hiring lawyers to block collection > efforts. Don't want to end up on the ass-end of a lawsuit? Then drive > like you own a brain. It's that simple. You two are going on like the OP and his wife are sleazebags with absolutely no evidence that 'I' have seen to back that up. I don't disagree with what you are saying, I am currently really messed up due to a careless driver. He even had insurance, but our 'no fault' system is basically broken and requires lawyers to sue. The insurance companies won't offer anything serious in compensation short of a trial. Mike |
Re: Under The Hood Question
Outatime wrote:
> > Mike Romain wrote: > > So I take it neither of you two jokers have ever been in an accident? > > > > ---- happens and you two are waaaaayyyyy out in left field attacking > > some poor guy with 'No' facts at hand.... > > > > Talk about a pair of losers.... > > I disagree, Mike. Fact: a woman rear-ends another vehicle. This moron > suggests she retain a lawyer to fend off collection efforts. I think > this is scuzzy behavior, and anyone who defends it is way off base. > > Ten years ago in Sacramento, a female doctor with a blood alcohol level > exceeding 0.20 drives up the wrong way onto a freeway offramp, hitting a > car head-on, killing all 4 kids inside. All 4 families file wrongful > death suits, and rightfully so. She lawyers up, waits until all 4 have > filed, then drops a Chapter 7 on the whole mess and WALKS AWAY like > nothing ever happened. Truly the pinnacle of scuzzy behavior. > > I've never been charged with causing an accident. I've been on the > butt-end of several, and every single time, the clod who caused it tries > his/her damndest to snake out of their financial responsibility. The > last moron who did this ended up facing me in Superior Court; I took his > condo, car, and his 401-k to satisfy the judgement. (No, he didn't feel > the need to bother carrying liability insurance.) > > So, don't preach to me about '---- happens.' I want to see someone > giddy with apology while pulling out the checkbook to take care of the > damages for a change, instead hiring lawyers to block collection > efforts. Don't want to end up on the ass-end of a lawsuit? Then drive > like you own a brain. It's that simple. You two are going on like the OP and his wife are sleazebags with absolutely no evidence that 'I' have seen to back that up. I don't disagree with what you are saying, I am currently really messed up due to a careless driver. He even had insurance, but our 'no fault' system is basically broken and requires lawyers to sue. The insurance companies won't offer anything serious in compensation short of a trial. Mike |
Re: Under The Hood Question
Mike Romain wrote:
> You two are going on like the OP and his wife are sleazebags with > absolutely no evidence that 'I' have seen to back that up. > > I don't disagree with what you are saying, I am currently really messed > up due to a careless driver. He even had insurance, but our 'no fault' > system is basically broken and requires lawyers to sue. The insurance > companies won't offer anything serious in compensation short of a trial. LOL. Methinks the OP was a troll, and James has a twisted sense of humor. And you're right: insurance companies love no-fault, which basically translates into no-pay. My solution: drink heavily. |
Re: Under The Hood Question
Mike Romain wrote:
> You two are going on like the OP and his wife are sleazebags with > absolutely no evidence that 'I' have seen to back that up. > > I don't disagree with what you are saying, I am currently really messed > up due to a careless driver. He even had insurance, but our 'no fault' > system is basically broken and requires lawyers to sue. The insurance > companies won't offer anything serious in compensation short of a trial. LOL. Methinks the OP was a troll, and James has a twisted sense of humor. And you're right: insurance companies love no-fault, which basically translates into no-pay. My solution: drink heavily. |
Re: Under The Hood Question
Mike Romain wrote:
> You two are going on like the OP and his wife are sleazebags with > absolutely no evidence that 'I' have seen to back that up. > > I don't disagree with what you are saying, I am currently really messed > up due to a careless driver. He even had insurance, but our 'no fault' > system is basically broken and requires lawyers to sue. The insurance > companies won't offer anything serious in compensation short of a trial. LOL. Methinks the OP was a troll, and James has a twisted sense of humor. And you're right: insurance companies love no-fault, which basically translates into no-pay. My solution: drink heavily. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands