|
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee
is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. How did they attach it to the cab? Jeff DeWitt L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote: > I would require the Comanche frame. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>Looks like someone was having fun with Photoshop. >> >>Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee
is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. How did they attach it to the cab? Jeff DeWitt L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote: > I would require the Comanche frame. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>Looks like someone was having fun with Photoshop. >> >>Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
I would guess they attached the cab to the frame the same way Ford,
Chevy or Dodge did. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > > Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee > is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. > How did they attach it to the cab? > > Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
I would guess they attached the cab to the frame the same way Ford,
Chevy or Dodge did. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > > Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee > is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. > How did they attach it to the cab? > > Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
I would guess they attached the cab to the frame the same way Ford,
Chevy or Dodge did. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > > Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee > is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. > How did they attach it to the cab? > > Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
But unless I'm wrong the cab on a Comanche was unit body like a
Cherokee, but the box had to sit on a frame. A regular pickup (Ford, Chevy, Dodge, Studebaker) and a full size frame with the cab and box attached to it, and the carucks like the El Caminio and the Brat were really cars with the rear modified to function more or less like a pickup box but the platform underneath remained unchanged. Jeff DeWitt L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote: > I would guess they attached the cab to the frame the same way Ford, > Chevy or Dodge did. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee >>is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. >> How did they attach it to the cab? >> >>Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
But unless I'm wrong the cab on a Comanche was unit body like a
Cherokee, but the box had to sit on a frame. A regular pickup (Ford, Chevy, Dodge, Studebaker) and a full size frame with the cab and box attached to it, and the carucks like the El Caminio and the Brat were really cars with the rear modified to function more or less like a pickup box but the platform underneath remained unchanged. Jeff DeWitt L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote: > I would guess they attached the cab to the frame the same way Ford, > Chevy or Dodge did. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee >>is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. >> How did they attach it to the cab? >> >>Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The ChineseJeep2500
But unless I'm wrong the cab on a Comanche was unit body like a
Cherokee, but the box had to sit on a frame. A regular pickup (Ford, Chevy, Dodge, Studebaker) and a full size frame with the cab and box attached to it, and the carucks like the El Caminio and the Brat were really cars with the rear modified to function more or less like a pickup box but the platform underneath remained unchanged. Jeff DeWitt L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote: > I would guess they attached the cab to the frame the same way Ford, > Chevy or Dodge did. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>Never thought about this before but that's kind of weird. The Cherokee >>is unit body, but the Comanche must have had at least a rear sub frame. >> How did they attach it to the cab? >> >>Jeff DeWitt |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The Chinese Jeep 2500
If you poke around you can find the page in English. The Chinese made a
number of improvements to the XJ. "Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:wAx0h.10$HD6.8@tornado.southeast.rr.com... > Sure looks like one to me, except for the weak engine and the sunroof. How > come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's? > > Jeff DeWitt > > Carl wrote: >> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0. >> >> Carl >> >> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message >> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com... >> >>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>See the link and tell us what you think: >>>> >>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html >>> >>>There is also a 2700 series >>> >>>2500 = 2.4 l >>>2700 = 2.7 l >> >> |
Re: They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The Chinese Jeep 2500
If you poke around you can find the page in English. The Chinese made a
number of improvements to the XJ. "Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:wAx0h.10$HD6.8@tornado.southeast.rr.com... > Sure looks like one to me, except for the weak engine and the sunroof. How > come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's? > > Jeff DeWitt > > Carl wrote: >> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0. >> >> Carl >> >> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message >> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com... >> >>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>See the link and tell us what you think: >>>> >>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html >>> >>>There is also a 2700 series >>> >>>2500 = 2.4 l >>>2700 = 2.7 l >> >> |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands