Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Stroking the 4.0 (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/stroking-4-0-a-9775/)

gosling1 01-10-2004 06:05 PM

Stroking the 4.0
 
I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the pistons
(.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block is
bored to match the pistons?

Thanks
chris
Tango Uniform

--
11th Commandant
"Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"



L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 01-10-2004 06:54 PM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Hi Chris,
I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
..030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

gosling1 wrote:
>
> I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the pistons
> (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
> pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block is
> bored to match the pistons?
>
> Thanks
> chris
> Tango Uniform
>
> --
> 11th Commandant
> "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 01-10-2004 06:54 PM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Hi Chris,
I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
..030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

gosling1 wrote:
>
> I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the pistons
> (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
> pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block is
> bored to match the pistons?
>
> Thanks
> chris
> Tango Uniform
>
> --
> 11th Commandant
> "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 01-10-2004 06:54 PM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Hi Chris,
I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
..030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

gosling1 wrote:
>
> I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the pistons
> (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
> pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block is
> bored to match the pistons?
>
> Thanks
> chris
> Tango Uniform
>
> --
> 11th Commandant
> "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"


gosling1 01-10-2004 09:11 PM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Bummer, thanks Bill. Now to order some more pistons (and find the time to
build 2 engines!)

Thanks again
chris
BT

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:400090C5.E3C51FF6@cox.net...
> Hi Chris,
> I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
> .030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
> http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> gosling1 wrote:
> >
> > I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the

pistons
> > (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
> > pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block

is
> > bored to match the pistons?
> >
> > Thanks
> > chris
> > Tango Uniform
> >
> > --
> > 11th Commandant
> > "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"




gosling1 01-10-2004 09:11 PM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Bummer, thanks Bill. Now to order some more pistons (and find the time to
build 2 engines!)

Thanks again
chris
BT

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:400090C5.E3C51FF6@cox.net...
> Hi Chris,
> I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
> .030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
> http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> gosling1 wrote:
> >
> > I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the

pistons
> > (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
> > pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block

is
> > bored to match the pistons?
> >
> > Thanks
> > chris
> > Tango Uniform
> >
> > --
> > 11th Commandant
> > "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"




gosling1 01-10-2004 09:11 PM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Bummer, thanks Bill. Now to order some more pistons (and find the time to
build 2 engines!)

Thanks again
chris
BT

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:400090C5.E3C51FF6@cox.net...
> Hi Chris,
> I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
> .030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
> http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> gosling1 wrote:
> >
> > I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the

pistons
> > (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
> > pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block

is
> > bored to match the pistons?
> >
> > Thanks
> > chris
> > Tango Uniform
> >
> > --
> > 11th Commandant
> > "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"




Cherokee-LTD 01-11-2004 07:23 AM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Keep the 4.2 con rods, they're shorter than the 4.0 con rods by .250 or so
IIRC... don't want to mash your valves!
Verify this before taking my word on it.
-Brian

"gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net> wrote in message
news:A82Mb.18121$qC.2879@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
: Bummer, thanks Bill. Now to order some more pistons (and find the time to
: build 2 engines!)
:
: Thanks again
: chris
: BT
:
: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
: news:400090C5.E3C51FF6@cox.net...
: > Hi Chris,
: > I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
: > .030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
: > http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
: > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > gosling1 wrote:
: > >
: > > I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the
: pistons
: > > (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
: > > pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block
: is
: > > bored to match the pistons?
: > >
: > > Thanks
: > > chris
: > > Tango Uniform
: > >
: > > --
: > > 11th Commandant
: > > "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"
:
:



Cherokee-LTD 01-11-2004 07:23 AM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Keep the 4.2 con rods, they're shorter than the 4.0 con rods by .250 or so
IIRC... don't want to mash your valves!
Verify this before taking my word on it.
-Brian

"gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net> wrote in message
news:A82Mb.18121$qC.2879@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
: Bummer, thanks Bill. Now to order some more pistons (and find the time to
: build 2 engines!)
:
: Thanks again
: chris
: BT
:
: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
: news:400090C5.E3C51FF6@cox.net...
: > Hi Chris,
: > I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
: > .030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
: > http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
: > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > gosling1 wrote:
: > >
: > > I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the
: pistons
: > > (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
: > > pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block
: is
: > > bored to match the pistons?
: > >
: > > Thanks
: > > chris
: > > Tango Uniform
: > >
: > > --
: > > 11th Commandant
: > > "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"
:
:



Cherokee-LTD 01-11-2004 07:23 AM

Re: Stroking the 4.0
 
Keep the 4.2 con rods, they're shorter than the 4.0 con rods by .250 or so
IIRC... don't want to mash your valves!
Verify this before taking my word on it.
-Brian

"gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net> wrote in message
news:A82Mb.18121$qC.2879@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
: Bummer, thanks Bill. Now to order some more pistons (and find the time to
: build 2 engines!)
:
: Thanks again
: chris
: BT
:
: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
: news:400090C5.E3C51FF6@cox.net...
: > Hi Chris,
: > I don't think so, the 4.2 liter has a stock bore of 3.75" plus your
: > .030" would still be smaller than the 4.0L's 3.875" stock pistons.
: > http://www.jeep4.0performance.4mg.com/photo3.html
: > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > gosling1 wrote:
: > >
: > > I have a 4.2 crank that has already been turned. I also have the
: pistons
: > > (.030 over) that were going to go into my CJ8. Question is; will the
: > > pistons that I have for the 4.2 work in a 4.0 block provided the block
: is
: > > bored to match the pistons?
: > >
: > > Thanks
: > > chris
: > > Tango Uniform
: > >
: > > --
: > > 11th Commandant
: > > "Thou shalt not lower a Jeep"
:
:




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.03192 seconds with 3 queries