Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sat, 26 May 2007 22:02:36 GMT, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
"Wyllis-Eva B. A. Carr" <B.A. Carr@cox.net> wrote:

>
>
>> check me out surfing in about thirty
>> minutes
>
>Back already?

Fined for water polution...


--
Ak'toh'di

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sun, 27 May 2007 00:52:49 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2007 22:02:36 GMT, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
> "Wyllis-Eva B. A. Carr" <B.A. Carr@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> check me out surfing in about thirty
>>> minutes
>>
>>Back already?
>
> Fined for water polution...

Again? Sheesh!

Probably got busted for frightening small children as well.

Or at least the ones that couldn't run fast enough.

(I'm thinking he's following in the fetid footsteps of his MinuteMaid
co-founder, who should be up on charges of child pornography fairly soon...)




--
From: ----------@cox.net (via teranews)

> > Reported to: internet.help@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca,
internet.abuse@sjrb.ca

> And they are very tired of you.

Message-ID: <464119a9$0$16368$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

Yes, there's a bitch that replies to me, kinda telling me the
problem's with the Canadian Shaw's personnel. But prescience pays off and
long as you violate the groups charter, or just Usenet's common decency,
I'll be there to report you. You being a traitor is a especial incentive.

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sun, 27 May 2007 00:52:49 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2007 22:02:36 GMT, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
> "Wyllis-Eva B. A. Carr" <B.A. Carr@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> check me out surfing in about thirty
>>> minutes
>>
>>Back already?
>
> Fined for water polution...

Again? Sheesh!

Probably got busted for frightening small children as well.

Or at least the ones that couldn't run fast enough.

(I'm thinking he's following in the fetid footsteps of his MinuteMaid
co-founder, who should be up on charges of child pornography fairly soon...)




--
From: ----------@cox.net (via teranews)

> > Reported to: internet.help@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca,
internet.abuse@sjrb.ca

> And they are very tired of you.

Message-ID: <464119a9$0$16368$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

Yes, there's a bitch that replies to me, kinda telling me the
problem's with the Canadian Shaw's personnel. But prescience pays off and
long as you violate the groups charter, or just Usenet's common decency,
I'll be there to report you. You being a traitor is a especial incentive.

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sun, 27 May 2007 00:52:49 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2007 22:02:36 GMT, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
> "Wyllis-Eva B. A. Carr" <B.A. Carr@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> check me out surfing in about thirty
>>> minutes
>>
>>Back already?
>
> Fined for water polution...

Again? Sheesh!

Probably got busted for frightening small children as well.

Or at least the ones that couldn't run fast enough.

(I'm thinking he's following in the fetid footsteps of his MinuteMaid
co-founder, who should be up on charges of child pornography fairly soon...)




--
From: ----------@cox.net (via teranews)

> > Reported to: internet.help@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca,
internet.abuse@sjrb.ca

> And they are very tired of you.

Message-ID: <464119a9$0$16368$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

Yes, there's a bitch that replies to me, kinda telling me the
problem's with the Canadian Shaw's personnel. But prescience pays off and
long as you violate the groups charter, or just Usenet's common decency,
I'll be there to report you. You being a traitor is a especial incentive.

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sun, 27 May 2007 00:52:49 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2007 22:02:36 GMT, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
> "Wyllis-Eva B. A. Carr" <B.A. Carr@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> check me out surfing in about thirty
>>> minutes
>>
>>Back already?
>
> Fined for water polution...

Again? Sheesh!

Probably got busted for frightening small children as well.

Or at least the ones that couldn't run fast enough.

(I'm thinking he's following in the fetid footsteps of his MinuteMaid
co-founder, who should be up on charges of child pornography fairly soon...)




--
From: ----------@cox.net (via teranews)

> > Reported to: internet.help@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca,
internet.abuse@sjrb.ca

> And they are very tired of you.

Message-ID: <464119a9$0$16368$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

Yes, there's a bitch that replies to me, kinda telling me the
problem's with the Canadian Shaw's personnel. But prescience pays off and
long as you violate the groups charter, or just Usenet's common decency,
I'll be there to report you. You being a traitor is a especial incentive.

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:29:55 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Not with your fake name and address:
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...rch+this+group

If you're talking to me, unfortunately my address isn't munged. If it
had been early on, it would have reduced the spam in my inbox.

Dan
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>"Hootowl" <ELN/zooo@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:c6rg53t675bndi4pil0lufrslbokksl5dn@4ax.com
>>
>> Several months ago, my Jeep dealer (the owner) told me Jeep was
>> bringing back the Scrambler. IIRC, I posted that news here (it may
>> have been in another group, though).

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:29:55 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Not with your fake name and address:
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...rch+this+group

If you're talking to me, unfortunately my address isn't munged. If it
had been early on, it would have reduced the spam in my inbox.

Dan
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>"Hootowl" <ELN/zooo@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:c6rg53t675bndi4pil0lufrslbokksl5dn@4ax.com
>>
>> Several months ago, my Jeep dealer (the owner) told me Jeep was
>> bringing back the Scrambler. IIRC, I posted that news here (it may
>> have been in another group, though).

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:29:55 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Not with your fake name and address:
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...rch+this+group

If you're talking to me, unfortunately my address isn't munged. If it
had been early on, it would have reduced the spam in my inbox.

Dan
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>"Hootowl" <ELN/zooo@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:c6rg53t675bndi4pil0lufrslbokksl5dn@4ax.com
>>
>> Several months ago, my Jeep dealer (the owner) told me Jeep was
>> bringing back the Scrambler. IIRC, I posted that news here (it may
>> have been in another group, though).

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:29:55 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Not with your fake name and address:
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...rch+this+group

If you're talking to me, unfortunately my address isn't munged. If it
had been early on, it would have reduced the spam in my inbox.

Dan
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>"Hootowl" <ELN/zooo@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:c6rg53t675bndi4pil0lufrslbokksl5dn@4ax.com
>>
>> Several months ago, my Jeep dealer (the owner) told me Jeep was
>> bringing back the Scrambler. IIRC, I posted that news here (it may
>> have been in another group, though).

Re: Return of the Scrambler?
 

On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:29:55 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:

Hell, your not even sure if that is your real name.

:> Not with your fake name and address:
:>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...rch+this+group
Removed do to Blasphemy.
:>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:>
:>
:>"Hootowl" <ELN/zooo@earthlink.net> wrote in message
:>news:c6rg53t675bndi4pil0lufrslbokksl5dn@4ax.com
:>>
:>> Several months ago, my Jeep dealer (the owner) told me Jeep was
:>> bringing back the Scrambler. IIRC, I posted that news here (it may
:>> have been in another group, though).