Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9 (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/rear-bearings-98-gc-5-9-a-4506/)

BEK 09-12-2003 12:26 PM

Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
Would it be unusual or indicate an inherent problem for the bearings in my
rear differential to be shot at 56,000 miles......no towing or off roading?

Looking for opinions from Jeep experts....I am not one!

Thanks
BEK



L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 09-12-2003 01:17 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
Hi BEK,
Yours is the only car I know of that may not be jacked up using
only one floor jack at the differential housing. That's how yours was
bent, and I don't know any recourse you have, other than to shell out
four thousand dollars.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

BEK wrote:
>
> Would it be unusual or indicate an inherent problem for the bearings in my
> rear differential to be shot at 56,000 miles......no towing or off roading?
>
> Looking for opinions from Jeep experts....I am not one!
>
> Thanks
> BEK


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 09-12-2003 01:17 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
Hi BEK,
Yours is the only car I know of that may not be jacked up using
only one floor jack at the differential housing. That's how yours was
bent, and I don't know any recourse you have, other than to shell out
four thousand dollars.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

BEK wrote:
>
> Would it be unusual or indicate an inherent problem for the bearings in my
> rear differential to be shot at 56,000 miles......no towing or off roading?
>
> Looking for opinions from Jeep experts....I am not one!
>
> Thanks
> BEK


Earle Horton 09-13-2003 12:13 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
"BEK" <greywingsspamfreezone@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:65H8b.433862$o%2.195871@sccrnsc02...
>
> > Yours is the only car I know of that may not be jacked up
> > using only one floor jack at the differential housing. That's how
> > yours was bent, and I don't know any recourse you have, other
> > than to shell out four thousand dollars.

>
>
> So does that mean the bearing I just paid to have put in will just wear
> out right away again since the whole rear end was not replaced?
> Please don't tell me that!
>

OK, *I* will say it then. What Bill said is most likely true. Differential
bearings normally last the life of a vehicle, except if it is raced, taken
off road, subjected to heavy duty use, etc. or has one of those cheap-ass
aluminum differential housings like you have. If this vehicle is otherwise
in good shape and worth keeping, you might want to investigate getting a
"real" cast iron differential housing for it.

Earle



Earle Horton 09-13-2003 12:13 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
"BEK" <greywingsspamfreezone@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:65H8b.433862$o%2.195871@sccrnsc02...
>
> > Yours is the only car I know of that may not be jacked up
> > using only one floor jack at the differential housing. That's how
> > yours was bent, and I don't know any recourse you have, other
> > than to shell out four thousand dollars.

>
>
> So does that mean the bearing I just paid to have put in will just wear
> out right away again since the whole rear end was not replaced?
> Please don't tell me that!
>

OK, *I* will say it then. What Bill said is most likely true. Differential
bearings normally last the life of a vehicle, except if it is raced, taken
off road, subjected to heavy duty use, etc. or has one of those cheap-ass
aluminum differential housings like you have. If this vehicle is otherwise
in good shape and worth keeping, you might want to investigate getting a
"real" cast iron differential housing for it.

Earle



Mike Romain 09-13-2003 12:48 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
Those seem to have a problem with bearings. I see it posted often,
usually at lower miles than yours has.

There is a TSB out on it, here is part of it:

Summary:
SPECIFICATIONS AND SERVICE PROCEDURES USED IN THE CURRENT
SERVICE MANUALS ARE BEING REVISED TO PROVIDE IMPROVED
DIFFERENTIAL BEARING LIFE. *YC

NHSTA# 9821

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


BEK wrote:
>
> Would it be unusual or indicate an inherent problem for the bearings in my
> rear differential to be shot at 56,000 miles......no towing or off roading?
>
> Looking for opinions from Jeep experts....I am not one!
>
> Thanks
> BEK


Mike Romain 09-13-2003 12:48 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
Those seem to have a problem with bearings. I see it posted often,
usually at lower miles than yours has.

There is a TSB out on it, here is part of it:

Summary:
SPECIFICATIONS AND SERVICE PROCEDURES USED IN THE CURRENT
SERVICE MANUALS ARE BEING REVISED TO PROVIDE IMPROVED
DIFFERENTIAL BEARING LIFE. *YC

NHSTA# 9821

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


BEK wrote:
>
> Would it be unusual or indicate an inherent problem for the bearings in my
> rear differential to be shot at 56,000 miles......no towing or off roading?
>
> Looking for opinions from Jeep experts....I am not one!
>
> Thanks
> BEK


BEK 09-13-2003 01:03 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F634A51.8F676AFC@sympatico.ca...
> Those seem to have a problem with bearings. I see it posted often,
> usually at lower miles than yours has.


Thanks to all for the info. Now I'm beginning to get the drift....Chrysler
puts a cheap-ass aluminum differential housing on to save themselves a few
bucks. Then, the first time the unsuspecting owner has his Jeep jacked up
for new tires or whatever, the housing is bent. This causes premature wear
on the bearings that are supposed to last, perhaps, the lifetime of the
vehicle. Just priceless! And at least one thing is for sure.....I'll never
buy another vehicle from them as long as I live.

BEK



BEK 09-13-2003 01:03 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F634A51.8F676AFC@sympatico.ca...
> Those seem to have a problem with bearings. I see it posted often,
> usually at lower miles than yours has.


Thanks to all for the info. Now I'm beginning to get the drift....Chrysler
puts a cheap-ass aluminum differential housing on to save themselves a few
bucks. Then, the first time the unsuspecting owner has his Jeep jacked up
for new tires or whatever, the housing is bent. This causes premature wear
on the bearings that are supposed to last, perhaps, the lifetime of the
vehicle. Just priceless! And at least one thing is for sure.....I'll never
buy another vehicle from them as long as I live.

BEK



Gerald G. McGeorge 09-13-2003 01:13 PM

Re: Rear bearings 98 GC 5.9
 
This axle got even worst in '999 on the WJ. Dana has caught Hell for it and
is probably going to lose their DC contracts. Issue there was R&P setup. My
'01 howls like banshee when cold and coasting downhill. Dealer said it was
"normal". (It's got a 70k mile warranty that will prove them wrong.)
"BEK" <greywingsspamfreezone@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:y5I8b.434458$o%2.197054@sccrnsc02...
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:3F634A51.8F676AFC@sympatico.ca...
> > Those seem to have a problem with bearings. I see it posted often,
> > usually at lower miles than yours has.

>
> Thanks to all for the info. Now I'm beginning to get the

drift....Chrysler
> puts a cheap-ass aluminum differential housing on to save themselves a few
> bucks. Then, the first time the unsuspecting owner has his Jeep jacked up
> for new tires or whatever, the housing is bent. This causes premature

wear
> on the bearings that are supposed to last, perhaps, the lifetime of the
> vehicle. Just priceless! And at least one thing is for sure.....I'll

never
> buy another vehicle from them as long as I live.
>
> BEK
>
>





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.05502 seconds with 5 queries