Re: Mr. BMW
Clem wrote:
> "Username" <chesshire_cat@nospam.net> wrote in message > news:IIHLa.14095$vx3.3716577@kent.svc.tds.net... > > >> stun-gunning the aerial would surely do in the radio receiver's front end >> circuitry. I can't imagine that being inexpensive in a BMW. > > > > Hey! Nifty idea. Would you zap with one electrode touching the antenna, and > the other electrode touching a chassis ground? > > Talk about discreet.... To fry out the receiver it would be best to go between antenna and chassis. |
Re: Mr. BMW
exactly.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:Dv2Ma.349364$3n5.280404@news2.central.cox.net ... > Clem wrote: > > "Username" <chesshire_cat@nospam.net> wrote in message > > news:IIHLa.14095$vx3.3716577@kent.svc.tds.net... > > > > > >> stun-gunning the aerial would surely do in the radio receiver's front end > >> circuitry. I can't imagine that being inexpensive in a BMW. > > > > > > > > Hey! Nifty idea. Would you zap with one electrode touching the antenna, and > > the other electrode touching a chassis ground? > > > > Talk about discreet.... > > To fry out the receiver it would be best to go between > antenna and chassis. > > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands