OT: Stalkers
 

It says OT, OK?

I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy who
sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think, was
when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
"common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's just
trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading about
my goddam "imaginary friends" too.

My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's implying
that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad part
is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo, what
will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now he's
got me talking to myself.

Play safe.

Earle

---
Mr. Hortom,

Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
a no-win(read 'loser') role.

Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.

As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
pathetic, rounded shoulders.
---
Ciao,

Earle

Re: Stalkers
 

357
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> It says OT, OK?
>
> I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy who
> sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think, was
> when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's just
> trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading about
> my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
>
> My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's implying
> that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
part
> is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo, what
> will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now he's
> got me talking to myself.
>
> Play safe.
>
> Earle
>
> ---
> Mr. Hortom,
>
> Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> a no-win(read 'loser') role.
>
> Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
>
> As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> ---
> Ciao,
>
> Earle
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

357
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> It says OT, OK?
>
> I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy who
> sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think, was
> when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's just
> trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading about
> my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
>
> My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's implying
> that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
part
> is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo, what
> will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now he's
> got me talking to myself.
>
> Play safe.
>
> Earle
>
> ---
> Mr. Hortom,
>
> Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> a no-win(read 'loser') role.
>
> Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
>
> As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> ---
> Ciao,
>
> Earle
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

357
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> It says OT, OK?
>
> I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy who
> sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think, was
> when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's just
> trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading about
> my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
>
> My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's implying
> that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
part
> is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo, what
> will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now he's
> got me talking to myself.
>
> Play safe.
>
> Earle
>
> ---
> Mr. Hortom,
>
> Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> a no-win(read 'loser') role.
>
> Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
>
> As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> ---
> Ciao,
>
> Earle
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

357
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> It says OT, OK?
>
> I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy who
> sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think, was
> when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's just
> trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading about
> my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
>
> My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's implying
> that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
part
> is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo, what
> will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now he's
> got me talking to myself.
>
> Play safe.
>
> Earle
>
> ---
> Mr. Hortom,
>
> Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> a no-win(read 'loser') role.
>
> Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
>
> As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> ---
> Ciao,
>
> Earle
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

Got to agree.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47082cdc$0$26490$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> 357
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
> news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> > It says OT, OK?
> >
> > I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy
who
> > sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> > full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think,
was
> > when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> > would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> > "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> > paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's
just
> > trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> > ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading
about
> > my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
> >
> > My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's
implying
> > that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> > doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
> part
> > is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> > handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo,
what
> > will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now
he's
> > got me talking to myself.
> >
> > Play safe.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > ---
> > Mr. Hortom,
> >
> > Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> > failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> > realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> > response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> > a no-win(read 'loser') role.
> >
> > Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> > attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> > hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> > more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> > forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
> >
> > As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> > ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> > would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> > another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> > that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> > environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> > and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> > as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> > pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> > ---
> > Ciao,
> >
> > Earle
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

Got to agree.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47082cdc$0$26490$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> 357
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
> news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> > It says OT, OK?
> >
> > I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy
who
> > sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> > full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think,
was
> > when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> > would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> > "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> > paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's
just
> > trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> > ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading
about
> > my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
> >
> > My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's
implying
> > that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> > doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
> part
> > is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> > handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo,
what
> > will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now
he's
> > got me talking to myself.
> >
> > Play safe.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > ---
> > Mr. Hortom,
> >
> > Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> > failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> > realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> > response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> > a no-win(read 'loser') role.
> >
> > Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> > attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> > hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> > more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> > forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
> >
> > As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> > ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> > would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> > another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> > that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> > environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> > and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> > as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> > pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> > ---
> > Ciao,
> >
> > Earle
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

Got to agree.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47082cdc$0$26490$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> 357
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
> news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> > It says OT, OK?
> >
> > I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy
who
> > sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> > full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think,
was
> > when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> > would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> > "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> > paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's
just
> > trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> > ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading
about
> > my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
> >
> > My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's
implying
> > that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> > doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
> part
> > is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> > handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo,
what
> > will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now
he's
> > got me talking to myself.
> >
> > Play safe.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > ---
> > Mr. Hortom,
> >
> > Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> > failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> > realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> > response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> > a no-win(read 'loser') role.
> >
> > Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> > attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> > hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> > more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> > forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
> >
> > As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> > ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> > would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> > another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> > that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> > environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> > and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> > as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> > pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> > ---
> > Ciao,
> >
> > Earle
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

Got to agree.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47082cdc$0$26490$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> 357
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
> news:fe8p00$fpc$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> > It says OT, OK?
> >
> > I got this in the mail Tuesday. The real U. S. Postal mail. The guy
who
> > sent it lives across the street from me. This guy is as crazy as a sack
> > full of ferrets and stupid too. What made him send it to me, I think,
was
> > when the sheriff told him to knock off sending me threats by mail or she
> > would have the DA file charges. Note the pseudoscientific terms such as
> > "common response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor" and "a
> > paranoid personality as you". This guy doesn't know anything. He's
just
> > trying to make me think that I'm like him, i.e. crazy as a sack full of
> > ferrets. Cute little guys, but crazy. I am real sick about reading
about
> > my goddam "imaginary friends" too.
> >
> > My wife says that males stalking males is really unusual. She's
implying
> > that Mike is some kind of gay sadistic pervert, I think. Now I lock the
> > doors to the house and sleep with a crow bar next to the bed. The sad
> part
> > is that this piece of human refuse is the only one to care for his
> > handicapped wife. When he's in the state mental hospital in Pueblo,
what
> > will she do? That would be somebody else's problem, Earle. See, now
he's
> > got me talking to myself.
> >
> > Play safe.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > ---
> > Mr. Hortom,
> >
> > Apparently, this 'annonymous' correspondent(see attached)
> > failed to have the necessary maturity or intelligence to
> > realize that self-projection is an oft and altogether common
> > response of the inadequate personality as an aggressor in
> > a no-win(read 'loser') role.
> >
> > Please extend my sincere condolences and best wishes for
> > attenuation of symptoms during therapy. I am, perhaps,
> > hasty in my assumption that this WAS from one(are there
> > more than one?) of your imaginary friends. If so, please
> > forgive the assumption that you had even one imaginary friend.
> >
> > As you are so concerned with your own culpability in an
> > ill-defined assumption of 'stalking and harassment', I
> > would conclude(also) that the implied cowardice is yet
> > another trait of those unwilling to publicly acknowledge
> > that of which they accuse...? I understand that your
> > environment is not conducive to emotional, intellectual,
> > and spiritual growth, but, as even a paranoid personality
> > as you must be aware, a benevolent God looks over your
> > pathetic, rounded shoulders.
> > ---
> > Ciao,
> >
> > Earle
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

Hi Dave,
Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
system in the UK.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> Got to agree.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

Hi Dave,
Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
system in the UK.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> Got to agree.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

Hi Dave,
Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
system in the UK.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> Got to agree.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

Hi Dave,
Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
system in the UK.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> Got to agree.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Stalkers
 

That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
implementations. Is this right?

Cheers,

Earle

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> Hi Dave,
> Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> system in the UK.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Got to agree.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
implementations. Is this right?

Cheers,

Earle

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> Hi Dave,
> Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> system in the UK.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Got to agree.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
implementations. Is this right?

Cheers,

Earle

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> Hi Dave,
> Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> system in the UK.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Got to agree.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
implementations. Is this right?

Cheers,

Earle

"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> Hi Dave,
> Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> system in the UK.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Got to agree.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

Re: Stalkers
 

You are correct. You need to have a lockable gun cabinet with a separate
locked sections for firearm and ammunition.

The law unforunately is hazy on whether or not you can use it to defend your
home. Or rather the law is very clear - you can use reasonable force. Quite
what reasonable force is is anyones guess. Shooting some little bastard in
the back and killing him as he flees is not, much to the indignation of the
entire country (cf Tony Martin, a farmer who after repeated vandalism to his
property shot his intruders
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Martin_%28farmer%29. The other gypsy who
got it in the leg even got legal aid to sue, not that he won). OTOH, I seem
to remember Lord Irvine, the head of the judiciary on tv saying that it was
ok as long as it was instinctive. So, if you think about it for a second,
presumably it isn't ok.

Just the message we need.

I woudn't want to be on the receiving end of one of Mr Remingtons 12 bore
rifled slugs - 1 oz travelling at 1760 fps has got to smart a little, at
nearly 3000 ft/pounds. Doubtless so inaccurate that you couldn't hit a barn
door with one at100 yards, but hey.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:febepu$ds2$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
> British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
> implementations. Is this right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
> news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > Hi Dave,
> > Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> > system in the UK.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> > news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > > Got to agree.
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>

Re: Stalkers
 

You are correct. You need to have a lockable gun cabinet with a separate
locked sections for firearm and ammunition.

The law unforunately is hazy on whether or not you can use it to defend your
home. Or rather the law is very clear - you can use reasonable force. Quite
what reasonable force is is anyones guess. Shooting some little bastard in
the back and killing him as he flees is not, much to the indignation of the
entire country (cf Tony Martin, a farmer who after repeated vandalism to his
property shot his intruders
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Martin_%28farmer%29. The other gypsy who
got it in the leg even got legal aid to sue, not that he won). OTOH, I seem
to remember Lord Irvine, the head of the judiciary on tv saying that it was
ok as long as it was instinctive. So, if you think about it for a second,
presumably it isn't ok.

Just the message we need.

I woudn't want to be on the receiving end of one of Mr Remingtons 12 bore
rifled slugs - 1 oz travelling at 1760 fps has got to smart a little, at
nearly 3000 ft/pounds. Doubtless so inaccurate that you couldn't hit a barn
door with one at100 yards, but hey.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:febepu$ds2$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
> British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
> implementations. Is this right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
> news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > Hi Dave,
> > Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> > system in the UK.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> > news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > > Got to agree.
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>

Re: Stalkers
 

You are correct. You need to have a lockable gun cabinet with a separate
locked sections for firearm and ammunition.

The law unforunately is hazy on whether or not you can use it to defend your
home. Or rather the law is very clear - you can use reasonable force. Quite
what reasonable force is is anyones guess. Shooting some little bastard in
the back and killing him as he flees is not, much to the indignation of the
entire country (cf Tony Martin, a farmer who after repeated vandalism to his
property shot his intruders
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Martin_%28farmer%29. The other gypsy who
got it in the leg even got legal aid to sue, not that he won). OTOH, I seem
to remember Lord Irvine, the head of the judiciary on tv saying that it was
ok as long as it was instinctive. So, if you think about it for a second,
presumably it isn't ok.

Just the message we need.

I woudn't want to be on the receiving end of one of Mr Remingtons 12 bore
rifled slugs - 1 oz travelling at 1760 fps has got to smart a little, at
nearly 3000 ft/pounds. Doubtless so inaccurate that you couldn't hit a barn
door with one at100 yards, but hey.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:febepu$ds2$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
> British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
> implementations. Is this right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
> news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > Hi Dave,
> > Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> > system in the UK.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> > news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > > Got to agree.
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>

Re: Stalkers
 

You are correct. You need to have a lockable gun cabinet with a separate
locked sections for firearm and ammunition.

The law unforunately is hazy on whether or not you can use it to defend your
home. Or rather the law is very clear - you can use reasonable force. Quite
what reasonable force is is anyones guess. Shooting some little bastard in
the back and killing him as he flees is not, much to the indignation of the
entire country (cf Tony Martin, a farmer who after repeated vandalism to his
property shot his intruders
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Martin_%28farmer%29. The other gypsy who
got it in the leg even got legal aid to sue, not that he won). OTOH, I seem
to remember Lord Irvine, the head of the judiciary on tv saying that it was
ok as long as it was instinctive. So, if you think about it for a second,
presumably it isn't ok.

Just the message we need.

I woudn't want to be on the receiving end of one of Mr Remingtons 12 bore
rifled slugs - 1 oz travelling at 1760 fps has got to smart a little, at
nearly 3000 ft/pounds. Doubtless so inaccurate that you couldn't hit a barn
door with one at100 yards, but hey.

Dave Milne, Scotland

"Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
news:febepu$ds2$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> That's just crazy. However, according to my limited understanding of
> British law, he may own any of the equally effective 12 gauge home alarm
> implementations. Is this right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in message
> news:47093110$0$26483$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> > Hi Dave,
> > Unfortunately for you, you may not own the Smith & Wesson home alarm
> > system in the UK.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote in message
> > news:no1Oi.113644$BW4.93053@fe1.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > > Got to agree.
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>