|
Re: Spyware
In news:inepc.9973$KE6.5968@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because: | Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything... | they ar ethe way to go!! | | Daniel Melameth wrote: | || Mike, || || No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread || newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste || bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people... Kids.... -- -- Joe Pribe NC jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com jegp 'at' hotmail.com ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ |
Re: Spyware
In news:inepc.9973$KE6.5968@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because: | Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything... | they ar ethe way to go!! | | Daniel Melameth wrote: | || Mike, || || No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread || newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste || bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people... Kids.... -- -- Joe Pribe NC jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com jegp 'at' hotmail.com ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ |
Re: Spyware
In news:inepc.9973$KE6.5968@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because: | Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything... | they ar ethe way to go!! | | Daniel Melameth wrote: | || Mike, || || No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread || newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste || bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people... Kids.... -- -- Joe Pribe NC jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com jegp 'at' hotmail.com ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ |
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote: >I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by >thread takes 'way' too much time. > >It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue >what you are talking about. > >Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of >the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it.. > >Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some >great fun with you... >;-) > >Mike It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while we're in "lecture mode." :-) > >Daniel Melameth wrote: >> >> Mike, >> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages... >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly >> quoting people... -- Less drivel, more Dremel. |
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote: >I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by >thread takes 'way' too much time. > >It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue >what you are talking about. > >Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of >the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it.. > >Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some >great fun with you... >;-) > >Mike It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while we're in "lecture mode." :-) > >Daniel Melameth wrote: >> >> Mike, >> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages... >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly >> quoting people... -- Less drivel, more Dremel. |
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote: >I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by >thread takes 'way' too much time. > >It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue >what you are talking about. > >Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of >the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it.. > >Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some >great fun with you... >;-) > >Mike It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while we're in "lecture mode." :-) > >Daniel Melameth wrote: >> >> Mike, >> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages... >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly >> quoting people... -- Less drivel, more Dremel. |
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote: >I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by >thread takes 'way' too much time. > >It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue >what you are talking about. > >Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of >the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it.. > >Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some >great fun with you... >;-) > >Mike It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while we're in "lecture mode." :-) > >Daniel Melameth wrote: >> >> Mike, >> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages... >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly >> quoting people... -- Less drivel, more Dremel. |
Re: Spyware
But not required by RFC 1855.
-- Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com... > It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I > don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars > waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that > top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while > we're in "lecture mode." :-) > >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages... > >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly > >> quoting people... > But not required by RFC 1855. |
Re: Spyware
But not required by RFC 1855.
-- Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com... > It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I > don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars > waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that > top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while > we're in "lecture mode." :-) > >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages... > >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly > >> quoting people... > But not required by RFC 1855. |
Re: Spyware
But not required by RFC 1855.
-- Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com... > It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I > don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars > waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that > top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while > we're in "lecture mode." :-) > >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages... > >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly > >> quoting people... > But not required by RFC 1855. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands