Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
Number 2.
Mike Nathan Otis wrote: > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > My theories: > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > unchallenged. > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > Which is likely more correct? > n. |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
Number 2.
Mike Nathan Otis wrote: > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > My theories: > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > unchallenged. > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > Which is likely more correct? > n. |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
Number 2.
Mike Nathan Otis wrote: > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > My theories: > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > unchallenged. > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > Which is likely more correct? > n. |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I say theory #1. My news server shows zero spam in the last few days.
Steve Nathan Otis wrote: > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > My theories: > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > unchallenged. > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > Which is likely more correct? > n. > > |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I say theory #1. My news server shows zero spam in the last few days.
Steve Nathan Otis wrote: > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > My theories: > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > unchallenged. > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > Which is likely more correct? > n. > > |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I say theory #1. My news server shows zero spam in the last few days.
Steve Nathan Otis wrote: > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > My theories: > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > unchallenged. > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > Which is likely more correct? > n. > > |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I say theory #1. My news server shows zero spam in the last few days.
Steve Nathan Otis wrote: > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > My theories: > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > unchallenged. > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > Which is likely more correct? > n. > > |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
ditto.
Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:t8vkc.32666$Np3.1184037@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca... > I say theory #1. My news server shows zero spam in the last few days. > > Steve > > Nathan Otis wrote: > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > > > My theories: > > > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > > unchallenged. > > > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > > > Which is likely more correct? > > n. > > > > |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
ditto.
Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:t8vkc.32666$Np3.1184037@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca... > I say theory #1. My news server shows zero spam in the last few days. > > Steve > > Nathan Otis wrote: > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > > > My theories: > > > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > > unchallenged. > > > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > > > Which is likely more correct? > > n. > > > > |
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
ditto.
Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "Steve" <xjlifter@bogus.com> wrote in message news:t8vkc.32666$Np3.1184037@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca... > I say theory #1. My news server shows zero spam in the last few days. > > Steve > > Nathan Otis wrote: > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it. > > > > My theories: > > > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through, > > unchallenged. > > > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass. > > > > Which is likely more correct? > > n. > > > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands