Re: Opinions on web page
 

No, no issues there. My bro-in-law hosts my site.

Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing that
there was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".


On Thu, 12 May 2005 21:39:22 -0500, "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:

>>jbjeep did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>> The question is coming up of do I leave the web page up or do I take it off
>>> line? Or perhaps password protect it? Long story of why, but I will let you
>>> know what happens, if anything.
>>> Any comments from the peanut gallery??
>>
>>Just guessing but if it's a problem with your ISP and running a server then
>>maby it's time to pick a web service or firewall the ISPs scanner IP.
>>More and more are getting picky about such things or like here on cox.net
>>simply blocking port 80 inbound to put a virtual cork in the problem.
>>
>>My "real" site is currently hosted by godaddy.com and whois protected by
>>domainsbyproxy.com since there are more than a few kooks out there
>>that would like to know where I live.
>>
>>www.revbeergoggles.com
>>
>>It comes with email, webmail, and basic services. They are also
>>very anti spam. www.godaddy.com has the price data. There are
>>cheaper but most also host spammers so email is iffy.

Re: Opinions on web page
 

No, no issues there. My bro-in-law hosts my site.

Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing that
there was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".


On Thu, 12 May 2005 21:39:22 -0500, "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:

>>jbjeep did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>> The question is coming up of do I leave the web page up or do I take it off
>>> line? Or perhaps password protect it? Long story of why, but I will let you
>>> know what happens, if anything.
>>> Any comments from the peanut gallery??
>>
>>Just guessing but if it's a problem with your ISP and running a server then
>>maby it's time to pick a web service or firewall the ISPs scanner IP.
>>More and more are getting picky about such things or like here on cox.net
>>simply blocking port 80 inbound to put a virtual cork in the problem.
>>
>>My "real" site is currently hosted by godaddy.com and whois protected by
>>domainsbyproxy.com since there are more than a few kooks out there
>>that would like to know where I live.
>>
>>www.revbeergoggles.com
>>
>>It comes with email, webmail, and basic services. They are also
>>very anti spam. www.godaddy.com has the price data. There are
>>cheaper but most also host spammers so email is iffy.

Re: Opinions on web page
 

No, no issues there. My bro-in-law hosts my site.

Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing that
there was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".


On Thu, 12 May 2005 21:39:22 -0500, "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:

>>jbjeep did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>> The question is coming up of do I leave the web page up or do I take it off
>>> line? Or perhaps password protect it? Long story of why, but I will let you
>>> know what happens, if anything.
>>> Any comments from the peanut gallery??
>>
>>Just guessing but if it's a problem with your ISP and running a server then
>>maby it's time to pick a web service or firewall the ISPs scanner IP.
>>More and more are getting picky about such things or like here on cox.net
>>simply blocking port 80 inbound to put a virtual cork in the problem.
>>
>>My "real" site is currently hosted by godaddy.com and whois protected by
>>domainsbyproxy.com since there are more than a few kooks out there
>>that would like to know where I live.
>>
>>www.revbeergoggles.com
>>
>>It comes with email, webmail, and basic services. They are also
>>very anti spam. www.godaddy.com has the price data. There are
>>cheaper but most also host spammers so email is iffy.

Re: Opinions on web page
 

Not a hacker issue.

Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing there
was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".



On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:46:42 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@cox.net> wrote:

>>Hi Jennifer,
>> I vote you keep it, for our enjoyment.
>> I realize it's a big job, but if you automatically back it up,
>>it'll reload easier when you're hit from time to time by hackers, that
>>replace your pictures and links with ----, like they do even with
>>official Government sites. like: http://whitehouse.gov just because it's
>>there.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>jbjeep wrote:
>>>
>>> http://jbjeep.terahex.com
>>>
>>> The question is coming up of do I leave the web page up or do I take it off line? Or
>>> perhaps password protect it? Long story of why, but I will let you know what
>>> happens, if anything.
>>> Any comments from the peanut gallery??

Re: Opinions on web page
 

Not a hacker issue.

Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing there
was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".



On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:46:42 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@cox.net> wrote:

>>Hi Jennifer,
>> I vote you keep it, for our enjoyment.
>> I realize it's a big job, but if you automatically back it up,
>>it'll reload easier when you're hit from time to time by hackers, that
>>replace your pictures and links with ----, like they do even with
>>official Government sites. like: http://whitehouse.gov just because it's
>>there.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>jbjeep wrote:
>>>
>>> http://jbjeep.terahex.com
>>>
>>> The question is coming up of do I leave the web page up or do I take it off line? Or
>>> perhaps password protect it? Long story of why, but I will let you know what
>>> happens, if anything.
>>> Any comments from the peanut gallery??

Re: Opinions on web page
 

Not a hacker issue.

Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing there
was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".



On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:46:42 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@cox.net> wrote:

>>Hi Jennifer,
>> I vote you keep it, for our enjoyment.
>> I realize it's a big job, but if you automatically back it up,
>>it'll reload easier when you're hit from time to time by hackers, that
>>replace your pictures and links with ----, like they do even with
>>official Government sites. like: http://whitehouse.gov just because it's
>>there.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>jbjeep wrote:
>>>
>>> http://jbjeep.terahex.com
>>>
>>> The question is coming up of do I leave the web page up or do I take it off line? Or
>>> perhaps password protect it? Long story of why, but I will let you know what
>>> happens, if anything.
>>> Any comments from the peanut gallery??

Re: Opinions on web page
 

Not a hacker issue.

Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing there
was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".



On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:46:42 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@cox.net> wrote:

>>Hi Jennifer,
>> I vote you keep it, for our enjoyment.
>> I realize it's a big job, but if you automatically back it up,
>>it'll reload easier when you're hit from time to time by hackers, that
>>replace your pictures and links with ----, like they do even with
>>official Government sites. like: http://whitehouse.gov just because it's
>>there.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>jbjeep wrote:
>>>
>>> http://jbjeep.terahex.com
>>>
>>> The question is coming up of do I leave the web page up or do I take it off line? Or
>>> perhaps password protect it? Long story of why, but I will let you know what
>>> happens, if anything.
>>> Any comments from the peanut gallery??

Re: Opinions on web page
 

The Greenie would just found another picture to use. And what would
they use that look so bad, I can't remember a picture that you weren't
in a wash or on the trail it's self. I think you could organize a neat
slide to show at there next meeting, like you have equal time coming to
you.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jbjeep wrote:
>
> Not a hacker issue.
>
> Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing there
> was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".

Re: Opinions on web page
 

The Greenie would just found another picture to use. And what would
they use that look so bad, I can't remember a picture that you weren't
in a wash or on the trail it's self. I think you could organize a neat
slide to show at there next meeting, like you have equal time coming to
you.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jbjeep wrote:
>
> Not a hacker issue.
>
> Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing there
> was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".

Re: Opinions on web page
 

The Greenie would just found another picture to use. And what would
they use that look so bad, I can't remember a picture that you weren't
in a wash or on the trail it's self. I think you could organize a neat
slide to show at there next meeting, like you have equal time coming to
you.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

jbjeep wrote:
>
> Not a hacker issue.
>
> Its more of a personal attack by a local land management agency, then hearing there
> was an "uproar at the region 3 meeting when those pictures were posted".