Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
Sounds to me he's describing the transfer case..."Big round riveted
> 'thing' on it from Syracuse New York." Which would make it a New Process case, which would mean 2.72 is the low range ratio in the 'case, not the final drive. "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:iTzGc.20523$Qj6.3584@fed1read05... > Decimal points are missing in many of the tags I read as a small part of my > job, yours is very likely a 2.72. > > Jerry > -- > Jerry Bransford > PP-ASEL N6TAY > See the Geezer Jeep at > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > "Daniel Paisley" <dmpazlee@webtv.net> wrote in message > news:15502-40EAC776-45@storefull-3111.bay.webtv.net... > > I'm kinda sure I'm gonna have to take my Jeep to a professional, I just > > wanted to say it before you did ;-) I looked at the rear differential, > > not a metal tag there. Somebody has been inside it and I can tell by the > > gasket 'ooze' around it. Tranny is nice and clean. Big round riveted > > 'thing' on it from Syracuse New York. It says gear ratio 272? No > > decimals near the 272 numbers. Front differential has a big tag on it, > > however I saw nothing to hint as a gear ratio. So now what? I don't know > > any Jeep professionals here in SE Ohio. > > > > Dan > > > > |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
You guessed it, it's '89 YJ.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Sounds to me he's describing the transfer case..."Big round riveted > > 'thing' on it from Syracuse New York." Which would make it a New Process > case, which would mean 2.72 is the low range ratio in the 'case, not the > final drive. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
You guessed it, it's '89 YJ.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Sounds to me he's describing the transfer case..."Big round riveted > > 'thing' on it from Syracuse New York." Which would make it a New Process > case, which would mean 2.72 is the low range ratio in the 'case, not the > final drive. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
You guessed it, it's '89 YJ.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Sounds to me he's describing the transfer case..."Big round riveted > > 'thing' on it from Syracuse New York." Which would make it a New Process > case, which would mean 2.72 is the low range ratio in the 'case, not the > final drive. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
You guessed it, it's '89 YJ.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Sounds to me he's describing the transfer case..."Big round riveted > > 'thing' on it from Syracuse New York." Which would make it a New Process > case, which would mean 2.72 is the low range ratio in the 'case, not the > final drive. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:iTzGc.20523$Qj6.3584@fed1read05... > Decimal points are missing in many of the tags I read as a small part of my > job, yours is very likely a 2.72. > > Jerry > -- Jerry, Isn't 2.72 the gear ratio of the LO Range in the Tcase, or is that 2.62? I can't imagine 2.72 gears in the diffs, that would be very tall. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:iTzGc.20523$Qj6.3584@fed1read05... > Decimal points are missing in many of the tags I read as a small part of my > job, yours is very likely a 2.72. > > Jerry > -- Jerry, Isn't 2.72 the gear ratio of the LO Range in the Tcase, or is that 2.62? I can't imagine 2.72 gears in the diffs, that would be very tall. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:iTzGc.20523$Qj6.3584@fed1read05... > Decimal points are missing in many of the tags I read as a small part of my > job, yours is very likely a 2.72. > > Jerry > -- Jerry, Isn't 2.72 the gear ratio of the LO Range in the Tcase, or is that 2.62? I can't imagine 2.72 gears in the diffs, that would be very tall. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:iTzGc.20523$Qj6.3584@fed1read05... > Decimal points are missing in many of the tags I read as a small part of my > job, yours is very likely a 2.72. > > Jerry > -- Jerry, Isn't 2.72 the gear ratio of the LO Range in the Tcase, or is that 2.62? I can't imagine 2.72 gears in the diffs, that would be very tall. |
Re: Ok Bill, Now what?
Hi Jeff,
I can't imagine it either, but your AMC 20 used it: http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/axle/amc20.html I'm going with Matt's guess Dan was reading from his transfer case, that 2.72 would have been stock in an '89 YJ: http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/xfer/np231.html God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ CRWLR wrote: > > Jerry, > Isn't 2.72 the gear ratio of the LO Range in the Tcase, or is that 2.62? I > can't imagine 2.72 gears in the diffs, that would be very tall. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands