Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:36:04 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >Jeepers wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <3F7D9A3B.6318DDBD@sympatico.ca>,
> >> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Bud, your software didn't send the photo over to the binary 4x4 group.
> >>
> >> I saw it there. There were several.
> >>
> >
> >Interesting, my server didn't pick them up...
>
> I just posted it back up there. Hopefully your newsreader can use
> yEnc.
> I usually post 400-600 Meg Binaries. The small ones are more of a pain
> as many peopel use OE and it's not setup to handle binary files.

Groan....

Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.

I see them tough!

Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.

What photo editor are you using?

Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.

400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.

My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
at 1.44M.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:36:04 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >Jeepers wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <3F7D9A3B.6318DDBD@sympatico.ca>,
> >> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Bud, your software didn't send the photo over to the binary 4x4 group.
> >>
> >> I saw it there. There were several.
> >>
> >
> >Interesting, my server didn't pick them up...
>
> I just posted it back up there. Hopefully your newsreader can use
> yEnc.
> I usually post 400-600 Meg Binaries. The small ones are more of a pain
> as many peopel use OE and it's not setup to handle binary files.

Groan....

Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.

I see them tough!

Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.

What photo editor are you using?

Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.

400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.

My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
at 1.44M.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:36:04 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >Jeepers wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <3F7D9A3B.6318DDBD@sympatico.ca>,
> >> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Bud, your software didn't send the photo over to the binary 4x4 group.
> >>
> >> I saw it there. There were several.
> >>
> >
> >Interesting, my server didn't pick them up...
>
> I just posted it back up there. Hopefully your newsreader can use
> yEnc.
> I usually post 400-600 Meg Binaries. The small ones are more of a pain
> as many peopel use OE and it's not setup to handle binary files.

Groan....

Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.

I see them tough!

Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.

What photo editor are you using?

Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.

400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.

My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
at 1.44M.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Hi Mike,
Yes, he should have croped and resized then attached it to the post
rather than inserted it, as I did to one of my posts to Dave over on our
Binary news group. It's nothing but a little Japanese truck they use in
the commercial flower beds out here in California.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Groan....
>
> Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
>
> I see them tough!
>
> Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
> took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.
>
> What photo editor are you using?
>
> Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
>
> 400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
>
> My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
> at 1.44M.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Hi Mike,
Yes, he should have croped and resized then attached it to the post
rather than inserted it, as I did to one of my posts to Dave over on our
Binary news group. It's nothing but a little Japanese truck they use in
the commercial flower beds out here in California.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Groan....
>
> Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
>
> I see them tough!
>
> Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
> took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.
>
> What photo editor are you using?
>
> Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
>
> 400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
>
> My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
> at 1.44M.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Hi Mike,
Yes, he should have croped and resized then attached it to the post
rather than inserted it, as I did to one of my posts to Dave over on our
Binary news group. It's nothing but a little Japanese truck they use in
the commercial flower beds out here in California.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Groan....
>
> Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
>
> I see them tough!
>
> Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
> took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.
>
> What photo editor are you using?
>
> Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
>
> 400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
>
> My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
> at 1.44M.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Got it by email and posted it as a 30.9K jpg in the 96 dpi sent at
640x480. over on the binary group.

Mike

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
> Yes, he should have croped and resized then attached it to the post
> rather than inserted it, as I did to one of my posts to Dave over on our
> Binary news group. It's nothing but a little Japanese truck they use in
> the commercial flower beds out here in California.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Groan....
> >
> > Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > I see them tough!
> >
> > Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
> > took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.
> >
> > What photo editor are you using?
> >
> > Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > 400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
> > at 1.44M.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Got it by email and posted it as a 30.9K jpg in the 96 dpi sent at
640x480. over on the binary group.

Mike

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
> Yes, he should have croped and resized then attached it to the post
> rather than inserted it, as I did to one of my posts to Dave over on our
> Binary news group. It's nothing but a little Japanese truck they use in
> the commercial flower beds out here in California.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Groan....
> >
> > Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > I see them tough!
> >
> > Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
> > took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.
> >
> > What photo editor are you using?
> >
> > Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > 400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
> > at 1.44M.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

Got it by email and posted it as a 30.9K jpg in the 96 dpi sent at
640x480. over on the binary group.

Mike

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
> Yes, he should have croped and resized then attached it to the post
> rather than inserted it, as I did to one of my posts to Dave over on our
> Binary news group. It's nothing but a little Japanese truck they use in
> the commercial flower beds out here in California.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Groan....
> >
> > Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > I see them tough!
> >
> > Even the guy that invented it is extremely pissed off that a 'friend'
> > took his code and tried to make it a 'new thing'.
> >
> > What photo editor are you using?
> >
> > Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > 400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > My Sony does one 'highest quality' bmp per floppy and it is just wicked
> > at 1.44M.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
 

In article <vnrehvube562d@corp.supernews.com>,
Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
>> It was a joke...
>> Bill only uses "real" computers!
>
>You know, the one's with the round headlights!

And the leaf springs!

:)

--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail