Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

I have flown in the forties and early fifties with my parents:
http://www.----------.com/pilotbeth.jpg
http://www.----------.com/grandpa.jpg Didn't take to it, enjoyed drag
racing.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Bret Ludwig wrote:
>
> Well, that's not the way that makes sense to me.
>
> Absolute pressure makes more sense. And using ONE unit instead of two
> makes even more sense. Anyone who has flown or worked on an airplane
> with a constant speed prop is guaranteed to agree.

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

I have flown in the forties and early fifties with my parents:
http://www.----------.com/pilotbeth.jpg
http://www.----------.com/grandpa.jpg Didn't take to it, enjoyed drag
racing.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Bret Ludwig wrote:
>
> Well, that's not the way that makes sense to me.
>
> Absolute pressure makes more sense. And using ONE unit instead of two
> makes even more sense. Anyone who has flown or worked on an airplane
> with a constant speed prop is guaranteed to agree.

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

I have flown in the forties and early fifties with my parents:
http://www.----------.com/pilotbeth.jpg
http://www.----------.com/grandpa.jpg Didn't take to it, enjoyed drag
racing.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Bret Ludwig wrote:
>
> Well, that's not the way that makes sense to me.
>
> Absolute pressure makes more sense. And using ONE unit instead of two
> makes even more sense. Anyone who has flown or worked on an airplane
> with a constant speed prop is guaranteed to agree.

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

You had to open that can of worms.

No one needs to rehash the Hamilton Standard problems.


"Noneyabusiness" <TopSecret@Need2No.com> wrote in message
news:ggtg92h1sgfcmrs5chavsfcfjddjcm22rp@4ax.com...
> On 20 Jun 2006 07:08:25 -0700, "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>> Normal atmospheric pressure at sea level is about fifteen pounds per
>>> square inch, which of course not a vacuum, that would be then read in
>>> inches of mercury. So, sane people would measure that fifteen pounds as
>>> just ZERO, and use the typical manifold gauge:
>>
>>
>> Well, that's not the way that makes sense to me.
>>
>> Absolute pressure makes more sense. And using ONE unit instead of two
>>makes even more sense. Anyone who has flown or worked on an airplane
>>with a constant speed prop is guaranteed to agree.
>
> I don't know about YOUR Jeep, but MY Jeep's propeller turns at a
> varying speed... <BFG>
>
> ...

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

You had to open that can of worms.

No one needs to rehash the Hamilton Standard problems.


"Noneyabusiness" <TopSecret@Need2No.com> wrote in message
news:ggtg92h1sgfcmrs5chavsfcfjddjcm22rp@4ax.com...
> On 20 Jun 2006 07:08:25 -0700, "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>> Normal atmospheric pressure at sea level is about fifteen pounds per
>>> square inch, which of course not a vacuum, that would be then read in
>>> inches of mercury. So, sane people would measure that fifteen pounds as
>>> just ZERO, and use the typical manifold gauge:
>>
>>
>> Well, that's not the way that makes sense to me.
>>
>> Absolute pressure makes more sense. And using ONE unit instead of two
>>makes even more sense. Anyone who has flown or worked on an airplane
>>with a constant speed prop is guaranteed to agree.
>
> I don't know about YOUR Jeep, but MY Jeep's propeller turns at a
> varying speed... <BFG>
>
> ...

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

You had to open that can of worms.

No one needs to rehash the Hamilton Standard problems.


"Noneyabusiness" <TopSecret@Need2No.com> wrote in message
news:ggtg92h1sgfcmrs5chavsfcfjddjcm22rp@4ax.com...
> On 20 Jun 2006 07:08:25 -0700, "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>> Normal atmospheric pressure at sea level is about fifteen pounds per
>>> square inch, which of course not a vacuum, that would be then read in
>>> inches of mercury. So, sane people would measure that fifteen pounds as
>>> just ZERO, and use the typical manifold gauge:
>>
>>
>> Well, that's not the way that makes sense to me.
>>
>> Absolute pressure makes more sense. And using ONE unit instead of two
>>makes even more sense. Anyone who has flown or worked on an airplane
>>with a constant speed prop is guaranteed to agree.
>
> I don't know about YOUR Jeep, but MY Jeep's propeller turns at a
> varying speed... <BFG>
>
> ...

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

Hi Bill,
You're not going to blame us that like put our hobby on our trailer
hitch receiver: http://www.hitchcorner.com/hitch_covers/4prop.jpg for
the butterfly effect, right?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> You had to open that can of worms.
>
> No one needs to rehash the Hamilton Standard problems.

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

Hi Bill,
You're not going to blame us that like put our hobby on our trailer
hitch receiver: http://www.hitchcorner.com/hitch_covers/4prop.jpg for
the butterfly effect, right?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> You had to open that can of worms.
>
> No one needs to rehash the Hamilton Standard problems.

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

Hi Bill,
You're not going to blame us that like put our hobby on our trailer
hitch receiver: http://www.hitchcorner.com/hitch_covers/4prop.jpg for
the butterfly effect, right?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

billy ray wrote:
>
> You had to open that can of worms.
>
> No one needs to rehash the Hamilton Standard problems.

Re: Manifold pressure off MAP sensor?
 

Yep, your receiver plug prop resulted in the death of a lot of good boys.


"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4498967E.958F6341@cox.net...
> Hi Bill,
> You're not going to blame us that like put our hobby on our trailer
> hitch receiver: http://www.hitchcorner.com/hitch_covers/4prop.jpg for
> the butterfly effect, right?
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> You had to open that can of worms.
>>
>> No one needs to rehash the Hamilton Standard problems.