L.W. ------ III (ßill) wrote:
> Then it wouldn't be a "replica", would it???????


Well yes, it would. Most replica cars have different materials and
structures than the cars they replicate. Such as the Corvair powered
Cords and Shay Model A's .

 

L.W. ------ III (ßill) wrote:
> Then it wouldn't be a "replica", would it???????


Well yes, it would. Most replica cars have different materials and
structures than the cars they replicate. Such as the Corvair powered
Cords and Shay Model A's .

 

L.W. ------ III (ßill) wrote:
> Then it wouldn't be a "replica", would it???????


Well yes, it would. Most replica cars have different materials and
structures than the cars they replicate. Such as the Corvair powered
Cords and Shay Model A's .

 

We've been through this before-

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium&

The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or
even, dare I say it- Titanium) :).

Howard.

p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even
"Real" :). H.


On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:58:48 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:

> There you go trolling again!
> The Mutt was built on an aluminum unitized body which of course
>doesn't have a frame to bolt Real springs to:
>http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military...ry/muttdrw.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bret Ludwig wrote:
>>
>> I heard there was a kit to build a replica of the Vietnam era M151
>> MUTT but with straight axles and common mechanicals (and much less
>> tendency to flip). Anyone know about it?

 

We've been through this before-

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium&

The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or
even, dare I say it- Titanium) :).

Howard.

p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even
"Real" :). H.


On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:58:48 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:

> There you go trolling again!
> The Mutt was built on an aluminum unitized body which of course
>doesn't have a frame to bolt Real springs to:
>http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military...ry/muttdrw.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bret Ludwig wrote:
>>
>> I heard there was a kit to build a replica of the Vietnam era M151
>> MUTT but with straight axles and common mechanicals (and much less
>> tendency to flip). Anyone know about it?

 

We've been through this before-

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium&

The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or
even, dare I say it- Titanium) :).

Howard.

p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even
"Real" :). H.


On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:58:48 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:

> There you go trolling again!
> The Mutt was built on an aluminum unitized body which of course
>doesn't have a frame to bolt Real springs to:
>http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military...ry/muttdrw.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bret Ludwig wrote:
>>
>> I heard there was a kit to build a replica of the Vietnam era M151
>> MUTT but with straight axles and common mechanicals (and much less
>> tendency to flip). Anyone know about it?

 

Howard,
Apparently your senility wouldn't allow your to remember that upon
research I corrected myself, saying they were all made from an aluminum
unitized body: http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military/m151/m151.html
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Howard Eisenhauer wrote:
>
> We've been through this before-
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium&
>
> The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or
> even, dare I say it- Titanium) :).
>
> Howard.
>
> p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even
> "Real" :). H

 

Howard,
Apparently your senility wouldn't allow your to remember that upon
research I corrected myself, saying they were all made from an aluminum
unitized body: http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military/m151/m151.html
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Howard Eisenhauer wrote:
>
> We've been through this before-
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium&
>
> The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or
> even, dare I say it- Titanium) :).
>
> Howard.
>
> p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even
> "Real" :). H

 

Howard,
Apparently your senility wouldn't allow your to remember that upon
research I corrected myself, saying they were all made from an aluminum
unitized body: http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military/m151/m151.html
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Howard Eisenhauer wrote:
>
> We've been through this before-
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium&
>
> The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or
> even, dare I say it- Titanium) :).
>
> Howard.
>
> p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even
> "Real" :). H

 

Many unibody cars have springs. All of them except Citroens, as far as
I know.