|
Re: lift size for tires...
What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted
springs? "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:43466EA2.5EB4327D@sympatico.ca... >I have tons of clearance with a 2.5" spring lift and a 1/2" extra from > YJ shackles. When I change my frame, I am dumping the longer shackles, > they cause me to eat a lot of u-joints over the years because they throw > the driveshaft geometry off a bit and I am not interested in dicking > around with shims to try and set it back stock. > > Mike > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > > Steve G wrote: >> >> Whats the general concensus for amount of lift on a CJ for 33" tires? |
Re: lift size for tires...
What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted
springs? "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:43466EA2.5EB4327D@sympatico.ca... >I have tons of clearance with a 2.5" spring lift and a 1/2" extra from > YJ shackles. When I change my frame, I am dumping the longer shackles, > they cause me to eat a lot of u-joints over the years because they throw > the driveshaft geometry off a bit and I am not interested in dicking > around with shims to try and set it back stock. > > Mike > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > > Steve G wrote: >> >> Whats the general concensus for amount of lift on a CJ for 33" tires? |
Re: lift size for tires...
What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted
springs? "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:43466EA2.5EB4327D@sympatico.ca... >I have tons of clearance with a 2.5" spring lift and a 1/2" extra from > YJ shackles. When I change my frame, I am dumping the longer shackles, > they cause me to eat a lot of u-joints over the years because they throw > the driveshaft geometry off a bit and I am not interested in dicking > around with shims to try and set it back stock. > > Mike > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > > Steve G wrote: >> >> Whats the general concensus for amount of lift on a CJ for 33" tires? |
Re: lift size for tires...
Steve G did pass the time by typing:
> What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted > springs? springs move the whole axle down, keeping the geometry. Where shackles just move the back of the spring down while the front stays put, tilting the axle up. I wonder though how 1/2" of larger shackle could do that since it probably puts all of 1 degree (or less) into the equasion. It's more likely the increased angle is just beyond what the stock U joints can do reliably and Mike would be better off with a CV joint conversion and prolly a slip yolk eliminator. couple o links http://www.collinsbrosjeep.com/tailshaft.htm http://www.jedi.com/obiwan/jeep/soa.html Somewhere out there I saw some shackles that could extend quit a bit but were held closed by pins for on-road use. Revolver shackles? Don't follow this too much, my springs are the coiliy type. > "Mike Romain" wrote... >> I have tons of clearance with a 2.5" spring lift and a 1/2" extra from >> YJ shackles. When I change my frame, I am dumping the longer shackles, >> they cause me to eat a lot of u-joints over the years because they throw >> the driveshaft geometry off a bit and I am not interested in dicking >> around with shims to try and set it back stock. >> >> Mike >> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >> >> Steve G wrote: >>> >>> Whats the general concensus for amount of lift on a CJ for 33" tires? |
Re: lift size for tires...
Steve G did pass the time by typing:
> What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted > springs? springs move the whole axle down, keeping the geometry. Where shackles just move the back of the spring down while the front stays put, tilting the axle up. I wonder though how 1/2" of larger shackle could do that since it probably puts all of 1 degree (or less) into the equasion. It's more likely the increased angle is just beyond what the stock U joints can do reliably and Mike would be better off with a CV joint conversion and prolly a slip yolk eliminator. couple o links http://www.collinsbrosjeep.com/tailshaft.htm http://www.jedi.com/obiwan/jeep/soa.html Somewhere out there I saw some shackles that could extend quit a bit but were held closed by pins for on-road use. Revolver shackles? Don't follow this too much, my springs are the coiliy type. > "Mike Romain" wrote... >> I have tons of clearance with a 2.5" spring lift and a 1/2" extra from >> YJ shackles. When I change my frame, I am dumping the longer shackles, >> they cause me to eat a lot of u-joints over the years because they throw >> the driveshaft geometry off a bit and I am not interested in dicking >> around with shims to try and set it back stock. >> >> Mike >> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >> >> Steve G wrote: >>> >>> Whats the general concensus for amount of lift on a CJ for 33" tires? |
Re: lift size for tires...
Steve G did pass the time by typing:
> What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted > springs? springs move the whole axle down, keeping the geometry. Where shackles just move the back of the spring down while the front stays put, tilting the axle up. I wonder though how 1/2" of larger shackle could do that since it probably puts all of 1 degree (or less) into the equasion. It's more likely the increased angle is just beyond what the stock U joints can do reliably and Mike would be better off with a CV joint conversion and prolly a slip yolk eliminator. couple o links http://www.collinsbrosjeep.com/tailshaft.htm http://www.jedi.com/obiwan/jeep/soa.html Somewhere out there I saw some shackles that could extend quit a bit but were held closed by pins for on-road use. Revolver shackles? Don't follow this too much, my springs are the coiliy type. > "Mike Romain" wrote... >> I have tons of clearance with a 2.5" spring lift and a 1/2" extra from >> YJ shackles. When I change my frame, I am dumping the longer shackles, >> they cause me to eat a lot of u-joints over the years because they throw >> the driveshaft geometry off a bit and I am not interested in dicking >> around with shims to try and set it back stock. >> >> Mike >> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >> >> Steve G wrote: >>> >>> Whats the general concensus for amount of lift on a CJ for 33" tires? |
Re: lift size for tires...
Leverage, just like you may curl more weight, than at arms length.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Steve G wrote: > > What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted > springs? |
Re: lift size for tires...
Leverage, just like you may curl more weight, than at arms length.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Steve G wrote: > > What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted > springs? |
Re: lift size for tires...
Leverage, just like you may curl more weight, than at arms length.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Steve G wrote: > > What is it about the longer shackles that cause this more than the lifted > springs? |
Off Topic.
Hi Doug,
Last Saturday night you had a suicide bomber blow himself up outside your stadium, he was only outside because he wouldn't let himself be searched. It went off before plan B, he would have been surrounded by students after the game. Anyway, the whole rest of the nation doesn't know about it, do you? was it on your television? God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ DougW wrote: <snip> |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands