Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/leftists-loonier-now-than-they-were-then-15879/)

Ack 05-28-2004 07:45 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 
nobody wrote:

> "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Regan/ Bush took
>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>>in on its self.

>
>
> But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> understand your point.
>


Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
understanding.

jaonajames 05-28-2004 08:09 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 

"Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
> nobody wrote:
>
> > "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Regan/ Bush took
> >>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
> >>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

fell
> >>in on its self.

> >
> >
> > But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> > collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> > helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> > saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> > understand your point.
> >

>
> Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
> understanding.


the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
were as afraid of you as you were of us.



jaonajames 05-28-2004 08:09 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 

"Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
> nobody wrote:
>
> > "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Regan/ Bush took
> >>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
> >>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

fell
> >>in on its self.

> >
> >
> > But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> > collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> > helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> > saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> > understand your point.
> >

>
> Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
> understanding.


the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
were as afraid of you as you were of us.



jaonajames 05-28-2004 08:09 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 

"Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
> nobody wrote:
>
> > "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Regan/ Bush took
> >>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
> >>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

fell
> >>in on its self.

> >
> >
> > But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> > collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> > helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> > saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> > understand your point.
> >

>
> Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
> understanding.


the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
were as afraid of you as you were of us.



jaonajames 05-28-2004 08:09 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 

"Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
> nobody wrote:
>
> > "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Regan/ Bush took
> >>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
> >>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

fell
> >>in on its self.

> >
> >
> > But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> > collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> > helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> > saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> > understand your point.
> >

>
> Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
> understanding.


the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
were as afraid of you as you were of us.



Ack 05-28-2004 08:13 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 
jaonajames wrote:
> "Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
> news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
>
>>nobody wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Regan/ Bush took
>>>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

>
> fell
>
>>>>in on its self.
>>>
>>>
>>>But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
>>>collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
>>>helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
>>>saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
>>>understand your point.
>>>

>>
>>Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
>>understanding.

>
>
> the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
> were as afraid of you as you were of us.
>
>

And who exactly is this "we" that you are purporting to speak for?

Ack 05-28-2004 08:13 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 
jaonajames wrote:
> "Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
> news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
>
>>nobody wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Regan/ Bush took
>>>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

>
> fell
>
>>>>in on its self.
>>>
>>>
>>>But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
>>>collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
>>>helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
>>>saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
>>>understand your point.
>>>

>>
>>Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
>>understanding.

>
>
> the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
> were as afraid of you as you were of us.
>
>

And who exactly is this "we" that you are purporting to speak for?

Ack 05-28-2004 08:13 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 
jaonajames wrote:
> "Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
> news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
>
>>nobody wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Regan/ Bush took
>>>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

>
> fell
>
>>>>in on its self.
>>>
>>>
>>>But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
>>>collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
>>>helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
>>>saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
>>>understand your point.
>>>

>>
>>Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
>>understanding.

>
>
> the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
> were as afraid of you as you were of us.
>
>

And who exactly is this "we" that you are purporting to speak for?

Ack 05-28-2004 08:13 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 
jaonajames wrote:
> "Ack" <ack@noresponse.com> wrote in message
> news:359c7b81f512716c283fb90d2a5ea0bb@news.teranew s.com...
>
>>nobody wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Regan/ Bush took
>>>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments

>
> fell
>
>>>>in on its self.
>>>
>>>
>>>But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
>>>collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
>>>helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
>>>saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
>>>understand your point.
>>>

>>
>>Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
>>understanding.

>
>
> the point is there was a lot more to it than Regan claiming victory , we
> were as afraid of you as you were of us.
>
>

And who exactly is this "we" that you are purporting to speak for?

jaonajames 05-28-2004 08:14 AM

Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
 

"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:Eswtc.46896$kc2.710360@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> janklowicz24@yahoo.com (DaveNOSPAM) wrote in
> news:1a9cab55.0405271652.2699f834@posting.google.c om:
>
> > Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
> > news:<sHqtc.46720$kc2.707702@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> >
> >> "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com> wrote in
> >> news:2hmqslFegha6U1@uni-berlin.de:
> >>
> >> > "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:Nxqtc.4193$Y45.3870@news02.roc.ny...
> >> >
> >> >> "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:2hmo53Felg3tU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >> >>
> >> >>> "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
> >> >>> news:ROptc.47157$bS1.41329@okepread02...
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Al Rantel
> >> >>>> Thursday, May 27, 2004
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> America has just witnessed once again how dangerous it would have
> >> >>>> been had Al Gore become President in 2000 instead of George W.
> >> >>>> Bush.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Oh for ----'s sake. Please die.
> >> >>
> >> >> I think we found a Kerry supporter
> >> >
> >> > No, you found someone with a brain. I know how strange that must be
> >> > to your kind.
> >>
> >> Saying "please die" does nothing to prove that you have any sort of
> >> thinking capacity.

> >
> > If you'd actually SEEN Gore's speech in full -- he spoke for about 90
> > minutes, you'd know that the shouting part comprised, oh, about 2
> > minutes MAX. But of course that's what the conservative-biased media
> > has been showing non-stop.
> >
> > Gore is saying nothing that over a dozen Republicans -- senators,
> > governors and military haven't said in slightly more hushed tones.
> > That is, this administration is a total and complete disaster as far
> > as Iraq is concerned.

>
> I wonder how Al feels about giving comfort to the enemy.

probably no different that he ever did but Russians Pols Romanians and
easterners in general were never America's enemy ok Stalin was but he was
nuts, Cya




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.12075 seconds with 5 queries