Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Leak Down test results (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/leak-down-test-results-11260/)

William Oliveri 02-11-2004 09:01 PM

Leak Down test results
 
Offical Complete results of the Leak down test with the proper fitting is as
follows:

#1 -- 14.4%
#2 -- 24.5%
#3 -- 17.7%
#4 -- 11.1%
#5 -- 10.0%
#6 -- 13.3%

Just for the record.



William Oliveri 02-11-2004 09:02 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 
BTW, on a cold engine.

"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c0emre$1577m4$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Offical Complete results of the Leak down test with the proper fitting is

as
> follows:
>
> #1 -- 14.4%
> #2 -- 24.5%
> #3 -- 17.7%
> #4 -- 11.1%
> #5 -- 10.0%
> #6 -- 13.3%
>
> Just for the record.
>
>




William Oliveri 02-11-2004 09:02 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 
BTW, on a cold engine.

"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c0emre$1577m4$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Offical Complete results of the Leak down test with the proper fitting is

as
> follows:
>
> #1 -- 14.4%
> #2 -- 24.5%
> #3 -- 17.7%
> #4 -- 11.1%
> #5 -- 10.0%
> #6 -- 13.3%
>
> Just for the record.
>
>




William Oliveri 02-11-2004 09:02 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 
BTW, on a cold engine.

"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c0emre$1577m4$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Offical Complete results of the Leak down test with the proper fitting is

as
> follows:
>
> #1 -- 14.4%
> #2 -- 24.5%
> #3 -- 17.7%
> #4 -- 11.1%
> #5 -- 10.0%
> #6 -- 13.3%
>
> Just for the record.
>
>




Simon Juncal 02-11-2004 09:41 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 
William Oliveri wrote:
> BTW, on a cold engine.


Wonder if doing it to a warm engine might be revealing?

I'm curious not having used a leak down tester, what does the percentage
signify?

If I was you the first thing I'd do is run around testing every car I
had that is running well... At the very least you can get an idea of
what kind of variation is common with the tester you have. If you find a
number of 10% variations then that 24.5% number doesn't look so scary ;)
If not then you may be looking at the gasket between #2 and #3 :(

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein


Simon Juncal 02-11-2004 09:41 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 
William Oliveri wrote:
> BTW, on a cold engine.


Wonder if doing it to a warm engine might be revealing?

I'm curious not having used a leak down tester, what does the percentage
signify?

If I was you the first thing I'd do is run around testing every car I
had that is running well... At the very least you can get an idea of
what kind of variation is common with the tester you have. If you find a
number of 10% variations then that 24.5% number doesn't look so scary ;)
If not then you may be looking at the gasket between #2 and #3 :(

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein


Simon Juncal 02-11-2004 09:41 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 
William Oliveri wrote:
> BTW, on a cold engine.


Wonder if doing it to a warm engine might be revealing?

I'm curious not having used a leak down tester, what does the percentage
signify?

If I was you the first thing I'd do is run around testing every car I
had that is running well... At the very least you can get an idea of
what kind of variation is common with the tester you have. If you find a
number of 10% variations then that 24.5% number doesn't look so scary ;)
If not then you may be looking at the gasket between #2 and #3 :(

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein


c 02-11-2004 10:11 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 

"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c0emre$1577m4$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Offical Complete results of the Leak down test with the proper fitting is

as
> follows:
>
> #1 -- 14.4%
> #2 -- 24.5%
> #3 -- 17.7%
> #4 -- 11.1%
> #5 -- 10.0%
> #6 -- 13.3%
>
> Just for the record.
>
>


Bill,

When you tested #2 and #3 cylinder, did you check to see where the leakage
was? #2 is a bit high and #3 is iffy. remember, a new engine can have as
much as 8%, so the rest of them appear to be ok.

Chris



c 02-11-2004 10:11 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 

"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c0emre$1577m4$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Offical Complete results of the Leak down test with the proper fitting is

as
> follows:
>
> #1 -- 14.4%
> #2 -- 24.5%
> #3 -- 17.7%
> #4 -- 11.1%
> #5 -- 10.0%
> #6 -- 13.3%
>
> Just for the record.
>
>


Bill,

When you tested #2 and #3 cylinder, did you check to see where the leakage
was? #2 is a bit high and #3 is iffy. remember, a new engine can have as
much as 8%, so the rest of them appear to be ok.

Chris



c 02-11-2004 10:11 PM

Re: Leak Down test results
 

"William Oliveri" <wuji@bigvalley.net> wrote in message
news:c0emre$1577m4$1@ID-193866.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Offical Complete results of the Leak down test with the proper fitting is

as
> follows:
>
> #1 -- 14.4%
> #2 -- 24.5%
> #3 -- 17.7%
> #4 -- 11.1%
> #5 -- 10.0%
> #6 -- 13.3%
>
> Just for the record.
>
>


Bill,

When you tested #2 and #3 cylinder, did you check to see where the leakage
was? #2 is a bit high and #3 is iffy. remember, a new engine can have as
much as 8%, so the rest of them appear to be ok.

Chris




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.03854 seconds with 3 queries