Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
product. That is pure SPAM.

I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
the post was not signed.

Mike

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Are you claiming that Jennifer has a connection with ARB ?
> Or is a "sucker" ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:43B57CBA.35A7FFDC@sympatico.ca...
> > I certainly do have an opinion on SPAM.
> >
> > If a company has to SPAM advertise where they are 'not' welcomed and in
> > violation of a Group's Charter to find 'suckers', then their product is
> > total rip off garbage.
> >
> > Nothing else would make any sense at all.
> >
> > Just 'my' opinion.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > jbjeep wrote:
> > >
> > > So you have no opinion on it Mike?
> > >
> > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:45:20 -0500, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >>This is 'not' a commercial group. This group has a Charter that
> forbids
> > > >>commercial posts.
> > > >>
> > > >>Here is the newsgroups Charter link:
> > > >>
> > >
> >>ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...s.makers.jeep+
> willys
> > > >>
> > > >>If you want to SPAM, there are lots of other places to do it.
> > > >>
> > > >>I also will personally boycott any spam artists that come here. If
> you
> > > >>have to spam your garbage to find suckers, it must be total junk.
> > > >>
> > > >>Mike
> > > >>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > > >>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> > > >>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> > > >>Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
> > > >>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> > > >>
> > > >>jbjeep wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >><SPAM SNIPPED>

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
product. That is pure SPAM.

I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
the post was not signed.

Mike

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Are you claiming that Jennifer has a connection with ARB ?
> Or is a "sucker" ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:43B57CBA.35A7FFDC@sympatico.ca...
> > I certainly do have an opinion on SPAM.
> >
> > If a company has to SPAM advertise where they are 'not' welcomed and in
> > violation of a Group's Charter to find 'suckers', then their product is
> > total rip off garbage.
> >
> > Nothing else would make any sense at all.
> >
> > Just 'my' opinion.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > jbjeep wrote:
> > >
> > > So you have no opinion on it Mike?
> > >
> > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:45:20 -0500, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >>This is 'not' a commercial group. This group has a Charter that
> forbids
> > > >>commercial posts.
> > > >>
> > > >>Here is the newsgroups Charter link:
> > > >>
> > >
> >>ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...s.makers.jeep+
> willys
> > > >>
> > > >>If you want to SPAM, there are lots of other places to do it.
> > > >>
> > > >>I also will personally boycott any spam artists that come here. If
> you
> > > >>have to spam your garbage to find suckers, it must be total junk.
> > > >>
> > > >>Mike
> > > >>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > > >>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> > > >>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> > > >>Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
> > > >>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> > > >>
> > > >>jbjeep wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >><SPAM SNIPPED>

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
it as spam and wouldn't post it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
> product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
> product. That is pure SPAM.
>
> I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
> the post was not signed.
>
> Mike

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
it as spam and wouldn't post it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
> product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
> product. That is pure SPAM.
>
> I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
> the post was not signed.
>
> Mike

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
it as spam and wouldn't post it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
> product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
> product. That is pure SPAM.
>
> I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
> the post was not signed.
>
> Mike

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

had the same headers and went through the same ISP as Jennifer's normal
posts.

Dave

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43B5DAC0.1671906C@cox.net...
> That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
> it as spam and wouldn't post it.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
> > product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
> > product. That is pure SPAM.
> >
> > I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
> > the post was not signed.
> >
> > Mike

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

had the same headers and went through the same ISP as Jennifer's normal
posts.

Dave

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43B5DAC0.1671906C@cox.net...
> That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
> it as spam and wouldn't post it.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
> > product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
> > product. That is pure SPAM.
> >
> > I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
> > the post was not signed.
> >
> > Mike

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

had the same headers and went through the same ISP as Jennifer's normal
posts.

Dave

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43B5DAC0.1671906C@cox.net...
> That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
> it as spam and wouldn't post it.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> >
> > Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
> > product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
> > product. That is pure SPAM.
> >
> > I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
> > the post was not signed.
> >
> > Mike

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

Jenn did a cut-n-paste from their web site and didn't flag or add a her
own comment, so the body of the message looked like spam. ("we sell...")



Dave Milne wrote:
> had the same headers and went through the same ISP as Jennifer's normal
> posts.
>
> Dave
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:43B5DAC0.1671906C@cox.net...
>
>> That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
>>it as spam and wouldn't post it.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Mike Romain wrote:
>>
>>>Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
>>>product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
>>>product. That is pure SPAM.
>>>
>>>I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
>>>the post was not signed.
>>>
>>>Mike
>
>
>

Re: interesting concept SPAM Warning!
 

Jenn did a cut-n-paste from their web site and didn't flag or add a her
own comment, so the body of the message looked like spam. ("we sell...")



Dave Milne wrote:
> had the same headers and went through the same ISP as Jennifer's normal
> posts.
>
> Dave
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:43B5DAC0.1671906C@cox.net...
>
>> That post never made it to my COX server, meaning they recognized
>>it as spam and wouldn't post it.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Mike Romain wrote:
>>
>>>Someone using Jennifer's email address came on this group selling a
>>>product. They claimed in the post, and I quote: "We distribute" the
>>>product. That is pure SPAM.
>>>
>>>I don't know that Jennifer is either the Spammer or the Sucker because
>>>the post was not signed.
>>>
>>>Mike
>
>
>