Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
Hi All,
Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from 1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what they're asking for it though. Thanks. D |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
In article <BDXyf.33953$0e.22394@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>, D <dpfer@r.com> wrote:
#Hi All, # Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from #1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has #been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 #was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is #I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what #they're asking for it though. # Thanks. #D Yes it was the firebreather for 1998, but now it is in the lower-middle of the road v8 range for 2006. The non-HO 4.7 has 230 hp, the HO 4.7 has 265 hp, and the 5.7 Hemi's got 325 hp. The 5.9 also requires 91 octane gas. And it is a pretty thirsty engine on top of that--13 city, 16 freeway (mpg). That's with a compression ratio of "just" 8.7 to 1. The 5.7 Hemi is recommended to use 89 and the compression ratio is higher at 9.6 to 1. As a sanity check, the 4.7 non-HO "must" take 87 octane and it's compression ratio is 9.5 to 1. Heck, the manual says it will run rough if you put better grades in it... (This I have NO idea why...) The current hot-rod topend engine is the 6.1 Hemi and while it also has to use 91, it's compression ratio is supposed to be 10-something to 1. And it is supposed to have 415-425 hp... (!!!) /herb |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
In article <BDXyf.33953$0e.22394@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>, D <dpfer@r.com> wrote:
#Hi All, # Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from #1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has #been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 #was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is #I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what #they're asking for it though. # Thanks. #D Yes it was the firebreather for 1998, but now it is in the lower-middle of the road v8 range for 2006. The non-HO 4.7 has 230 hp, the HO 4.7 has 265 hp, and the 5.7 Hemi's got 325 hp. The 5.9 also requires 91 octane gas. And it is a pretty thirsty engine on top of that--13 city, 16 freeway (mpg). That's with a compression ratio of "just" 8.7 to 1. The 5.7 Hemi is recommended to use 89 and the compression ratio is higher at 9.6 to 1. As a sanity check, the 4.7 non-HO "must" take 87 octane and it's compression ratio is 9.5 to 1. Heck, the manual says it will run rough if you put better grades in it... (This I have NO idea why...) The current hot-rod topend engine is the 6.1 Hemi and while it also has to use 91, it's compression ratio is supposed to be 10-something to 1. And it is supposed to have 415-425 hp... (!!!) /herb |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
In article <BDXyf.33953$0e.22394@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>, D <dpfer@r.com> wrote:
#Hi All, # Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from #1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has #been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 #was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is #I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what #they're asking for it though. # Thanks. #D Yes it was the firebreather for 1998, but now it is in the lower-middle of the road v8 range for 2006. The non-HO 4.7 has 230 hp, the HO 4.7 has 265 hp, and the 5.7 Hemi's got 325 hp. The 5.9 also requires 91 octane gas. And it is a pretty thirsty engine on top of that--13 city, 16 freeway (mpg). That's with a compression ratio of "just" 8.7 to 1. The 5.7 Hemi is recommended to use 89 and the compression ratio is higher at 9.6 to 1. As a sanity check, the 4.7 non-HO "must" take 87 octane and it's compression ratio is 9.5 to 1. Heck, the manual says it will run rough if you put better grades in it... (This I have NO idea why...) The current hot-rod topend engine is the 6.1 Hemi and while it also has to use 91, it's compression ratio is supposed to be 10-something to 1. And it is supposed to have 415-425 hp... (!!!) /herb |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
it's a specialty vehicle that does require premium gas or it's pings badly
D wrote: > Hi All, > Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from > 1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has > been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 > was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is > I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what > they're asking for it though. > Thanks. > D |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
it's a specialty vehicle that does require premium gas or it's pings badly
D wrote: > Hi All, > Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from > 1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has > been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 > was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is > I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what > they're asking for it though. > Thanks. > D |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
it's a specialty vehicle that does require premium gas or it's pings badly
D wrote: > Hi All, > Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from > 1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has > been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 > was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is > I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what > they're asking for it though. > Thanks. > D |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
and any car with the 6.1 is dam near 45 k ---- that DC it is not worth it
Herb Leong wrote: > In article <BDXyf.33953$0e.22394@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>, D <dpfer@r.com> wrote: > #Hi All, > # Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from > #1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has > #been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 > #was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is > #I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what > #they're asking for it though. > # Thanks. > #D > > Yes it was the firebreather for 1998, but now it is in the lower-middle of > the road v8 range for 2006. > > The non-HO 4.7 has 230 hp, the HO 4.7 has 265 hp, and the 5.7 Hemi's got > 325 hp. > > The 5.9 also requires 91 octane gas. And it is a pretty thirsty engine > on top of that--13 city, 16 freeway (mpg). That's with a compression > ratio of "just" 8.7 to 1. > > The 5.7 Hemi is recommended to use 89 and the compression ratio is higher > at 9.6 to 1. > > As a sanity check, the 4.7 non-HO "must" take 87 octane and it's > compression ratio is 9.5 to 1. Heck, the manual says it will run > rough if you put better grades in it... (This I have NO idea why...) > > The current hot-rod topend engine is the 6.1 Hemi and while it also has to > use 91, it's compression ratio is supposed to be 10-something to 1. And it > is supposed to have 415-425 hp... (!!!) > > /herb |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
and any car with the 6.1 is dam near 45 k ---- that DC it is not worth it
Herb Leong wrote: > In article <BDXyf.33953$0e.22394@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>, D <dpfer@r.com> wrote: > #Hi All, > # Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from > #1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has > #been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 > #was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is > #I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what > #they're asking for it though. > # Thanks. > #D > > Yes it was the firebreather for 1998, but now it is in the lower-middle of > the road v8 range for 2006. > > The non-HO 4.7 has 230 hp, the HO 4.7 has 265 hp, and the 5.7 Hemi's got > 325 hp. > > The 5.9 also requires 91 octane gas. And it is a pretty thirsty engine > on top of that--13 city, 16 freeway (mpg). That's with a compression > ratio of "just" 8.7 to 1. > > The 5.7 Hemi is recommended to use 89 and the compression ratio is higher > at 9.6 to 1. > > As a sanity check, the 4.7 non-HO "must" take 87 octane and it's > compression ratio is 9.5 to 1. Heck, the manual says it will run > rough if you put better grades in it... (This I have NO idea why...) > > The current hot-rod topend engine is the 6.1 Hemi and while it also has to > use 91, it's compression ratio is supposed to be 10-something to 1. And it > is supposed to have 415-425 hp... (!!!) > > /herb |
Re: Grand Cherokee 5.9 Advice
and any car with the 6.1 is dam near 45 k ---- that DC it is not worth it
Herb Leong wrote: > In article <BDXyf.33953$0e.22394@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>, D <dpfer@r.com> wrote: > #Hi All, > # Just looking for input on what you think of the 5.9 Grand Cherokee from > #1998 as a reliable vehicle. I have a 1993 with the 4.0 inline 6 that has > #been great for over 265,000 miles. Is the V-8 as reliable? I know this V-8 > #was a special order type thing and is a real fire-breather. Reason I ask is > #I have seen one for sale in town and it's very nice looking. Not sure what > #they're asking for it though. > # Thanks. > #D > > Yes it was the firebreather for 1998, but now it is in the lower-middle of > the road v8 range for 2006. > > The non-HO 4.7 has 230 hp, the HO 4.7 has 265 hp, and the 5.7 Hemi's got > 325 hp. > > The 5.9 also requires 91 octane gas. And it is a pretty thirsty engine > on top of that--13 city, 16 freeway (mpg). That's with a compression > ratio of "just" 8.7 to 1. > > The 5.7 Hemi is recommended to use 89 and the compression ratio is higher > at 9.6 to 1. > > As a sanity check, the 4.7 non-HO "must" take 87 octane and it's > compression ratio is 9.5 to 1. Heck, the manual says it will run > rough if you put better grades in it... (This I have NO idea why...) > > The current hot-rod topend engine is the 6.1 Hemi and while it also has to > use 91, it's compression ratio is supposed to be 10-something to 1. And it > is supposed to have 415-425 hp... (!!!) > > /herb |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands