front dana 44 into back?
 

Is there any reason a front dana 44 from an F250 couldn't go into the back
of a narrow track CJ7, I realize the D 44 is offset to one side, but if I
measure the short side from rim to center of pumpkin it's 22" if I measure
my AMC 20 in my CJ it's just under 22", so if I had the other side of the D
44 cut down, is there any reason it wouldn't work, aside from axles turning
backwards, what other problem would there be?. This is a free D 44, with
disk brakes, which I'm sure could be made to work on the back of a CJ.
Anyone have any thoughts?

Re: front dana 44 into back?
 

Hi Greg,
Is it a reverse cut, pinion high? If so, it may too weak to be used
on the rear.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Greg wrote:
>
> Is there any reason a front dana 44 from an F250 couldn't go into the back
> of a narrow track CJ7, I realize the D 44 is offset to one side, but if I
> measure the short side from rim to center of pumpkin it's 22" if I measure
> my AMC 20 in my CJ it's just under 22", so if I had the other side of the D
> 44 cut down, is there any reason it wouldn't work, aside from axles turning
> backwards, what other problem would there be?. This is a free D 44, with
> disk brakes, which I'm sure could be made to work on the back of a CJ.
> Anyone have any thoughts?

Re: front dana 44 into back?
 

Hi Greg,
Is it a reverse cut, pinion high? If so, it may too weak to be used
on the rear.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Greg wrote:
>
> Is there any reason a front dana 44 from an F250 couldn't go into the back
> of a narrow track CJ7, I realize the D 44 is offset to one side, but if I
> measure the short side from rim to center of pumpkin it's 22" if I measure
> my AMC 20 in my CJ it's just under 22", so if I had the other side of the D
> 44 cut down, is there any reason it wouldn't work, aside from axles turning
> backwards, what other problem would there be?. This is a free D 44, with
> disk brakes, which I'm sure could be made to work on the back of a CJ.
> Anyone have any thoughts?

Re: front dana 44 into back?
 

Hi Greg,
Is it a reverse cut, pinion high? If so, it may too weak to be used
on the rear.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Greg wrote:
>
> Is there any reason a front dana 44 from an F250 couldn't go into the back
> of a narrow track CJ7, I realize the D 44 is offset to one side, but if I
> measure the short side from rim to center of pumpkin it's 22" if I measure
> my AMC 20 in my CJ it's just under 22", so if I had the other side of the D
> 44 cut down, is there any reason it wouldn't work, aside from axles turning
> backwards, what other problem would there be?. This is a free D 44, with
> disk brakes, which I'm sure could be made to work on the back of a CJ.
> Anyone have any thoughts?

Re: front dana 44 into back?
 

Yes, it is reverse.

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3FD26FA0.CD328BCC@cox.net...
> Hi Greg,
> Is it a reverse cut, pinion high? If so, it may too weak to be used
> on the rear.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Greg wrote:
> >
> > Is there any reason a front dana 44 from an F250 couldn't go into the
back
> > of a narrow track CJ7, I realize the D 44 is offset to one side, but if
I
> > measure the short side from rim to center of pumpkin it's 22" if I
measure
> > my AMC 20 in my CJ it's just under 22", so if I had the other side of
the D
> > 44 cut down, is there any reason it wouldn't work, aside from axles
turning
> > backwards, what other problem would there be?. This is a free D 44, with
> > disk brakes, which I'm sure could be made to work on the back of a CJ.
> > Anyone have any thoughts?

Re: front dana 44 into back?
 

Yes, it is reverse.

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3FD26FA0.CD328BCC@cox.net...
> Hi Greg,
> Is it a reverse cut, pinion high? If so, it may too weak to be used
> on the rear.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Greg wrote:
> >
> > Is there any reason a front dana 44 from an F250 couldn't go into the
back
> > of a narrow track CJ7, I realize the D 44 is offset to one side, but if
I
> > measure the short side from rim to center of pumpkin it's 22" if I
measure
> > my AMC 20 in my CJ it's just under 22", so if I had the other side of
the D
> > 44 cut down, is there any reason it wouldn't work, aside from axles
turning
> > backwards, what other problem would there be?. This is a free D 44, with
> > disk brakes, which I'm sure could be made to work on the back of a CJ.
> > Anyone have any thoughts?

Re: front dana 44 into back?
 

Yes, it is reverse.

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3FD26FA0.CD328BCC@cox.net...
> Hi Greg,
> Is it a reverse cut, pinion high? If so, it may too weak to be used
> on the rear.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Greg wrote:
> >
> > Is there any reason a front dana 44 from an F250 couldn't go into the
back
> > of a narrow track CJ7, I realize the D 44 is offset to one side, but if
I
> > measure the short side from rim to center of pumpkin it's 22" if I
measure
> > my AMC 20 in my CJ it's just under 22", so if I had the other side of
the D
> > 44 cut down, is there any reason it wouldn't work, aside from axles
turning
> > backwards, what other problem would there be?. This is a free D 44, with
> > disk brakes, which I'm sure could be made to work on the back of a CJ.
> > Anyone have any thoughts?