Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are able
to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
That's where the education comes in.

"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:449e$429535e5$4275e4bb$15838@FUSE.NET...
>
> Education has nothing to do with it. Here's the problem: For the US to
> compete globally, we need tangible goods to sell. Education does nothing
> to
> give us those tangible goods to sell to the world. Someone has to actually
> produce them. In the late 1980's, Pres. Bush declared that he wanted to
> push the transition of the US to a service oriented society, which is the
> last stage defined by Karl Marx in the evolution of a society's economy.
> This has been the fundemental shift that has been happening since the
> early
> 1980's, where we've gradually gone to making more and more goods outside
> the US. There has been a push to become more of a global marketplace and a
> global economy. The problem with this is that you have to have something
> to
> sell to the world. At first, you'd think that we'd sell our services of
> our
> expertise. Well, the shift of computer related jobs to India has shown
> that
> that type of work can be exported a lot easier than moving an entire
> production plant. Now, once that knowledge has been gained by foreign
> countries, what else do we have to sell to the world? If we've become a
> society that is too expensive to employ, we then don't have any hard goods
> to sell. We then face economic collapse. When it becomes too easy to
> replace you with someone on another continent for a lot less, then we're
> doomed.
>
> The US is something like 1/3 the entire world consumer market, and roughly
> the size of the entire european continent combined. However, if we keep
> trying to cut costs by eliminating jobs by sending them outside our
> borders, or replacing them with foreign immigrants who pay no taxes, and
> the government subsidizing such action, we'll find ourselves in desperate
> times. For too long, white collar and self-employed people have looked the
> other way because it didn't affect them. Well, it's beginning to. Again,
> they can ship white collar jobs outside the US far cheaper than they can
> move a plant. If the current trend continues, you'll find company
> accounting records kept in India, etc..
>
> Self-employed people need to be worried too. As more and more production
> of
> goods is outside the US, larger, more global companies are arising,
> stamping out the mom-and-pops and small businesses out of the market
> altogether. Witness Walmart. 80% of their goods are produced in foreign
> countries, typically in sweat shops. That enables them to sell cheaper,
> and
> runs smaller chains out. This is a disease that we all are catching
> because
> we like to pay less. Again, this country is becoming more out for
> themselves to a degree unprecedented. Everyone feels like they deserve
> $100,000+ a year, but the next guy gets paid too much for what he does.
> We're driving down our collective standard of living, as a result. This
> way
> of thinking is a sinking ship...
>
>> Big business loves this trend. Like all socioecononomic shifts, there
>> will
>> be some that will be left behind. You want to stay employed...the
>> emphasis
>> will be to stay employable.
>
> Yeah, and like lemmings, we're following this trend...
>
> And when all the tangible goods are made outside the US, accounting,
> computer related positions, and just about all white collar work is
> exported to India and management only needs a computer readout of the
> reports? What then? Is it even possible to stay employable? Doing what?
> When enough people can't find work, or cannot earn a decent enough living,
> then the market for goods collapses, sending the economy down the toilet
> with it to doomsday.
>
> For this country to survive, we need people earning good livings. I don't
> just mean a few with college educations, I mean the vast majority of
> everyday people. Then, they pay lots of taxes, the government has money to
> do its job, and the consumer market flourishes and fuels a booming
> economy.
> Instead, we're trying to rid this country of good paying jobs by exporting
> them somewhere else. I heard a local talk radio host claim that we export
> low paying jobs and gain high paying jobs in the process. However, I don't
> see those jobs lost by GM, Ford, and DC worker to Mexico as being low pay.
>
> I'm telling you...this trend is dangerous for the economy in the long run.
> It's good for corporate America, but bad for you and I.
>
>> I see your point...I think a lot of it was in the gas crunch of the 70's
>> people wanted smaller, fuel efficient cars, and the domestics really
>> didn't have much to offer, while almost every Japanese car was small and
>> fuel efficient, quality notwithstanding. That really opened the
>> floodgates
>> and the quality improvement perception came later as they built up market
>> share and the domestics' quality stagnated through the early 80's.
>
> Yes, it's like Ferrari, BMW, Porsche, Mercedes, etc... Look back into
> 1970's
> at their products. They're far inferior in most ways to American
> counterparts of the period. Ferrari's were beautiful cars with kit car
> build quality. Mechanically they were unreliable. They weren't all that
> impressive performance-wise either. Sure, the snobby will call their
> performance "balanced", but a common Chevelle SS would outgun most
> Ferraris
> in an acceleration contest. The one on Magnum PI had a 0-60 time of
> something like 9 seconds! The original VW GTi was capable of that. Even
> the
> Corvette during those poor performance years could go faster. Porsche
> never
> even made a fast car until the 1978 911 Turbo was released, and its
> performance would have been laughed at between 1967 to 1971. Have you even
> seen a 70's era Bimmer or Benz? Most were nothing to look at... There was
> nothing special about Mercedes vehicles back then, but somehow in the
> 1980's we began a love affair with them and that funded them to improve
> their product to be where they are now. Same goes for Honda, Toyota, and
> Datsun (Nissan). Our need for fuel efficiency provided them with the much
> needed funds, combined with their ambitition, led to the admittedly good
> products they have now. But back then, there was nothing special about
> them. I remember reading an article about a Toyota 2000GT, where they were
> so unreliable that the engine needed rebuilt every 60K or something like
> that. They got the reliability later, after we funded it.
>
>
> --
>
> Registered Linux user #378193

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Hi Matt,
Would you like fries with that? Like pretty soon that's all that
sheep's skin will be worth in a service only economy, that's if you have
a buck to boot. Of couse, the buck will be worthless too with a product
to back it up. Thanks God for Krugerrands.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Hi Matt,
Would you like fries with that? Like pretty soon that's all that
sheep's skin will be worth in a service only economy, that's if you have
a buck to boot. Of couse, the buck will be worthless too with a product
to back it up. Thanks God for Krugerrands.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Hi Matt,
Would you like fries with that? Like pretty soon that's all that
sheep's skin will be worth in a service only economy, that's if you have
a buck to boot. Of couse, the buck will be worthless too with a product
to back it up. Thanks God for Krugerrands.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Hi Matt,
Would you like fries with that? Like pretty soon that's all that
sheep's skin will be worth in a service only economy, that's if you have
a buck to boot. Of couse, the buck will be worthless too with a product
to back it up. Thanks God for Krugerrands.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:

> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are
> able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Again, when they also export accounts payable, accounts receivable,
accounting, data entry and all other computer related jobs, what's left?
What can you possibly get skilled at? Be lawyers? Doctors? Radio disc
jockeys? How many of those types of jobs are needed vs. the ever increasing
population of this country? Will we have a need for 300 million of these
jobs? The need for those jobs vs. the number of people needing work won't
add up. This kind of stuff has been preached to us until the point that
people believed it. However, if you really look into it, after we've
commoditized all of the jobs and sent them elsewhere, this country will be
in an economic disaster.


--

Registered Linux user #378193

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:

> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are
> able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Again, when they also export accounts payable, accounts receivable,
accounting, data entry and all other computer related jobs, what's left?
What can you possibly get skilled at? Be lawyers? Doctors? Radio disc
jockeys? How many of those types of jobs are needed vs. the ever increasing
population of this country? Will we have a need for 300 million of these
jobs? The need for those jobs vs. the number of people needing work won't
add up. This kind of stuff has been preached to us until the point that
people believed it. However, if you really look into it, after we've
commoditized all of the jobs and sent them elsewhere, this country will be
in an economic disaster.


--

Registered Linux user #378193

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:

> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are
> able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Again, when they also export accounts payable, accounts receivable,
accounting, data entry and all other computer related jobs, what's left?
What can you possibly get skilled at? Be lawyers? Doctors? Radio disc
jockeys? How many of those types of jobs are needed vs. the ever increasing
population of this country? Will we have a need for 300 million of these
jobs? The need for those jobs vs. the number of people needing work won't
add up. This kind of stuff has been preached to us until the point that
people believed it. However, if you really look into it, after we've
commoditized all of the jobs and sent them elsewhere, this country will be
in an economic disaster.


--

Registered Linux user #378193

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:

> I think you're looking at it backwards. Education has everthing to do with
> it. To stay employable, workers are going to have to get themselves
> proficient at a whole new skillset, and more flexible in what they are
> able
> to do, since assembly-line manufacturing jobs are being moved elsewhere.
> That's where the education comes in.

Again, when they also export accounts payable, accounts receivable,
accounting, data entry and all other computer related jobs, what's left?
What can you possibly get skilled at? Be lawyers? Doctors? Radio disc
jockeys? How many of those types of jobs are needed vs. the ever increasing
population of this country? Will we have a need for 300 million of these
jobs? The need for those jobs vs. the number of people needing work won't
add up. This kind of stuff has been preached to us until the point that
people believed it. However, if you really look into it, after we've
commoditized all of the jobs and sent them elsewhere, this country will be
in an economic disaster.


--

Registered Linux user #378193

Re: Detroit Vs Japan
 

Scotty wrote:

> I
> asked a real truck owner why he recently bought a Toyota Tundra and he
> told me that he had driven two Toyota cars to 200,000 miles without any
> problems and with nothing more than regular maintenance while his last
> Ford truck needed an engine at 95,000 miles and the interior and body
> started to deteriorate at 65,000 miles.

And I have a 1994 Jeep Wrangler Sport with 146,000 on the odometer, and it
has only needed a clutch @ 143,000 and a new header since a weld has now
cracked in the original. It's still going strong and driven everyday. This
inline 6 was designed by AMC, which was not known for reliability, and
redesigned by Chrysler to update it with fuel injection, etc.. So what does
that tell you? Any car can be driven to 200,000+ if treated right and
normal maintenance has been religious enough.

I'm in the construction trade and it's RARE to see a Toyota truck on the lot
of any construction site I've ever been on.


--

Registered Linux user #378193