D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
The thing that has so far kept me from upgrading running gear and
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
suspension, aside from the fact that I don't really need it, is the desire
to avoid doing things wrong. There are so many ways, that you can screw
up...
Earle
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:p5XRf.18066$wH5.7210@trnddc02...
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Or Ranger, that you're more likely to match your gear ratio and
> > limited slip: http://www.geocities.com/yj3qtr_ton/88swap.html
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
That's why my nine inch axles are different lengths:
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car:
http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jeff wrote:
>
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car:
http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jeff wrote:
>
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
That's why my nine inch axles are different lengths:
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car:
http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jeff wrote:
>
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car:
http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jeff wrote:
>
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: D35 to Ford 8.8 rear end
That's why my nine inch axles are different lengths:
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car:
http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jeff wrote:
>
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff
http://www.----------.com/9axles.jpg Ever since my first race car:
http://www.----------.com/dragster.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jeff wrote:
>
> Hey Bill, That install you pointed out looks kinda odd. It is showing
> the pinion rotated up like you would do for a CV style driveshaft, but
> the pinion on the Ford 8.8 however is offset from center about 1 1/2". I
> would expect that one to shake like hell and eat U-joints. Parallel
> shafts and simple U-joints would be the better bet.
>
> --
> jeff