|
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:44:25 +0000, Archie Leach wrote:
> > Time limit for voting: through Saturday morning, whenever. I have appended something to my answers; if necessary, you may remove it, although it is at the root os all this. > > Questions: > > Do you think Bill ------'s campaign to rid rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys > of "trolls" has been effective? > > a. YES > b. NO A double NO Doubly NO because a very large part of his motivation is to do the same to the groups where he started all this (alt.binaries.pictures.autos and alt.binaries.automobile.pictures), and where he continually crossposts all his brilliant sreeed. > > > Do you think Bill ------ should stop posting his standardized responses > in r.a.m.j+w? > > a. YES > b. NO Absolutely, and not post them to alt.binaries.pictures.autos and alt.binaries.automobile.pictures either, as he has been doing continually. > > One vote per individual. Please don't try to vote multiple times with > your various sockpuppets, 24bit, or else you will be disqualified. PF -- Cooyon Billie might actually be good with computers. After all, long before they were available to the public, he was already quite adept at Booting the Colonel...... |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:44:25 +0000, Archie Leach wrote:
> > Time limit for voting: through Saturday morning, whenever. I have appended something to my answers; if necessary, you may remove it, although it is at the root os all this. > > Questions: > > Do you think Bill ------'s campaign to rid rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys > of "trolls" has been effective? > > a. YES > b. NO A double NO Doubly NO because a very large part of his motivation is to do the same to the groups where he started all this (alt.binaries.pictures.autos and alt.binaries.automobile.pictures), and where he continually crossposts all his brilliant sreeed. > > > Do you think Bill ------ should stop posting his standardized responses > in r.a.m.j+w? > > a. YES > b. NO Absolutely, and not post them to alt.binaries.pictures.autos and alt.binaries.automobile.pictures either, as he has been doing continually. > > One vote per individual. Please don't try to vote multiple times with > your various sockpuppets, 24bit, or else you will be disqualified. PF -- Cooyon Billie might actually be good with computers. After all, long before they were available to the public, he was already quite adept at Booting the Colonel...... |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:44:25 +0000, Archie Leach wrote:
> > Time limit for voting: through Saturday morning, whenever. I have appended something to my answers; if necessary, you may remove it, although it is at the root os all this. > > Questions: > > Do you think Bill ------'s campaign to rid rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys > of "trolls" has been effective? > > a. YES > b. NO A double NO Doubly NO because a very large part of his motivation is to do the same to the groups where he started all this (alt.binaries.pictures.autos and alt.binaries.automobile.pictures), and where he continually crossposts all his brilliant sreeed. > > > Do you think Bill ------ should stop posting his standardized responses > in r.a.m.j+w? > > a. YES > b. NO Absolutely, and not post them to alt.binaries.pictures.autos and alt.binaries.automobile.pictures either, as he has been doing continually. > > One vote per individual. Please don't try to vote multiple times with > your various sockpuppets, 24bit, or else you will be disqualified. PF -- Cooyon Billie might actually be good with computers. After all, long before they were available to the public, he was already quite adept at Booting the Colonel...... |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:07:11 -0800, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,alt.binaries.pictures .autos,alt.binaries.automobile.pictures Gee, gosh and golly, he alliterated, look who changed the "newsgroups" line again in message: Message-ID: <FOydnWkaQcIOl7TanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@giganews.com> -- Cooyon Billie might actually be good with computers. After all, long before they were available to the public, he was already quite adept at Booting the Colonel...... |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:07:11 -0800, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,alt.binaries.pictures .autos,alt.binaries.automobile.pictures Gee, gosh and golly, he alliterated, look who changed the "newsgroups" line again in message: Message-ID: <FOydnWkaQcIOl7TanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@giganews.com> -- Cooyon Billie might actually be good with computers. After all, long before they were available to the public, he was already quite adept at Booting the Colonel...... |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:07:11 -0800, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,alt.binaries.pictures .autos,alt.binaries.automobile.pictures Gee, gosh and golly, he alliterated, look who changed the "newsgroups" line again in message: Message-ID: <FOydnWkaQcIOl7TanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@giganews.com> -- Cooyon Billie might actually be good with computers. After all, long before they were available to the public, he was already quite adept at Booting the Colonel...... |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
>Time limit for voting: through Saturday morning, whenever. > >Questions: > >Do you think Bill ------'s campaign to rid >rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys of "trolls" has been effective? > >a. YES >b. NO YES All the trolls are defeated. > > >Do you think Bill ------ should stop posting his standardized >responses in r.a.m.j+w? > >a. YES >b. NO NO All of Usenet needs to see Billi-Screed. > >One vote per individual. Please don't try to vote multiple times with >your various sockpuppets, 24bit, or else you will be disqualified. Thank you. [orfvqrf, v jnag gb frr uvz rnea n xraal zrqny] -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion", as designated by Brad Guth COOSN-266-06-39716 |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
>Time limit for voting: through Saturday morning, whenever. > >Questions: > >Do you think Bill ------'s campaign to rid >rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys of "trolls" has been effective? > >a. YES >b. NO YES All the trolls are defeated. > > >Do you think Bill ------ should stop posting his standardized >responses in r.a.m.j+w? > >a. YES >b. NO NO All of Usenet needs to see Billi-Screed. > >One vote per individual. Please don't try to vote multiple times with >your various sockpuppets, 24bit, or else you will be disqualified. Thank you. [orfvqrf, v jnag gb frr uvz rnea n xraal zrqny] -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion", as designated by Brad Guth COOSN-266-06-39716 |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
>Time limit for voting: through Saturday morning, whenever. > >Questions: > >Do you think Bill ------'s campaign to rid >rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys of "trolls" has been effective? > >a. YES >b. NO YES All the trolls are defeated. > > >Do you think Bill ------ should stop posting his standardized >responses in r.a.m.j+w? > >a. YES >b. NO NO All of Usenet needs to see Billi-Screed. > >One vote per individual. Please don't try to vote multiple times with >your various sockpuppets, 24bit, or else you will be disqualified. Thank you. [orfvqrf, v jnag gb frr uvz rnea n xraal zrqny] -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion", as designated by Brad Guth COOSN-266-06-39716 |
Re: CALL FOR VOTE: On the posting behavior of Bill Hughes
Archie Leach wrote: > Time limit for voting: through Saturday morning, whenever. > > Questions: > > Do you think Bill ------'s campaign to rid > rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys of "trolls" has been effective? > > a. YES > b. NO b. "NO" - he is still posting . > Do you think Bill ------ should stop posting his standardized > responses in r.a.m.j+w? > > a. YES > b. NO > > One vote per individual. Please don't try to vote multiple times with > your various sockpuppets, 24bit, or else you will be disqualified. b. "NO" - his posts are useful for training bots. -- "so, speech is not what im worried about." -- Steve wolfo0909@gmail.com i think she looks sweet. http://content1.myyearbook.com/thumb..._phpm5KRMi.jpg http://groups.google.com/group/alt.r...5df80dfa199b93 http://video.google.com/googleplayer...76550623867087 |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands