Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

Cassandra Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:

>Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in
>> news:Xns99DD7EC1BE5Cstillnolawsuitedmo@207.14.116. 130:
>>
>>> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
>>> news:472c17f2$0$26424$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the back up. But it may be better for you to work
>>>> behind the
>>>> scenes, reporting as many as you have time for. Zero in on the foul
>>>> language, as remailers as crossposting will not get them any more, and
>>>> has lead to me to a slackening of etiquette.
>>> Can you get any more incoherent, you slobbering putz?
>>>
>>
>> I have faith in him.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
>Is it just me, or did anyone else notice that Bill's lone supporter
>(like Bill himself) can't tell the difference between "your" and
>"you're"? Could this be Bill socking up to support himself?

Bertie's not a supporter of Bill. I think he saying that he has faith
that Silly Bill -can- and -will- get more incoherent.

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

Archie Leach wrote:
> Cassandra Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in
>>> news:Xns99DD7EC1BE5Cstillnolawsuitedmo@207.14.116. 130:
>>>
>>>> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
>>>> news:472c17f2$0$26424$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the back up. But it may be better for you to work
>>>>> behind the
>>>>> scenes, reporting as many as you have time for. Zero in on the foul
>>>>> language, as remailers as crossposting will not get them any more, and
>>>>> has lead to me to a slackening of etiquette.
>>>> Can you get any more incoherent, you slobbering putz?
>>>>
>>> I have faith in him.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> Is it just me, or did anyone else notice that Bill's lone supporter
>> (like Bill himself) can't tell the difference between "your" and
>> "you're"? Could this be Bill socking up to support himself?
>
> Bertie's not a supporter of Bill. I think he saying that he has faith
> that Silly Bill -can- and -will- get more incoherent.
>
>
>

Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice munged
up the attributions, as usual.

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

Archie Leach wrote:
> Cassandra Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in
>>> news:Xns99DD7EC1BE5Cstillnolawsuitedmo@207.14.116. 130:
>>>
>>>> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
>>>> news:472c17f2$0$26424$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the back up. But it may be better for you to work
>>>>> behind the
>>>>> scenes, reporting as many as you have time for. Zero in on the foul
>>>>> language, as remailers as crossposting will not get them any more, and
>>>>> has lead to me to a slackening of etiquette.
>>>> Can you get any more incoherent, you slobbering putz?
>>>>
>>> I have faith in him.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> Is it just me, or did anyone else notice that Bill's lone supporter
>> (like Bill himself) can't tell the difference between "your" and
>> "you're"? Could this be Bill socking up to support himself?
>
> Bertie's not a supporter of Bill. I think he saying that he has faith
> that Silly Bill -can- and -will- get more incoherent.
>
>
>

Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice munged
up the attributions, as usual.

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

Archie Leach wrote:
> Cassandra Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in
>>> news:Xns99DD7EC1BE5Cstillnolawsuitedmo@207.14.116. 130:
>>>
>>>> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
>>>> news:472c17f2$0$26424$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the back up. But it may be better for you to work
>>>>> behind the
>>>>> scenes, reporting as many as you have time for. Zero in on the foul
>>>>> language, as remailers as crossposting will not get them any more, and
>>>>> has lead to me to a slackening of etiquette.
>>>> Can you get any more incoherent, you slobbering putz?
>>>>
>>> I have faith in him.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> Is it just me, or did anyone else notice that Bill's lone supporter
>> (like Bill himself) can't tell the difference between "your" and
>> "you're"? Could this be Bill socking up to support himself?
>
> Bertie's not a supporter of Bill. I think he saying that he has faith
> that Silly Bill -can- and -will- get more incoherent.
>
>
>

Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice munged
up the attributions, as usual.

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
news:sh7Xi.715$ck5.652@newsfe09.phx...
....
> Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice
> munged up the attributions, as usual.

Most of your posts here are about Bill. Nothing about Jeeps at all. I
did notice that once you posted something about Waldron. Do you have a
life?

Cheers,

Earle



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
news:sh7Xi.715$ck5.652@newsfe09.phx...
....
> Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice
> munged up the attributions, as usual.

Most of your posts here are about Bill. Nothing about Jeeps at all. I
did notice that once you posted something about Waldron. Do you have a
life?

Cheers,

Earle



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
news:sh7Xi.715$ck5.652@newsfe09.phx...
....
> Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice
> munged up the attributions, as usual.

Most of your posts here are about Bill. Nothing about Jeeps at all. I
did notice that once you posted something about Waldron. Do you have a
life?

Cheers,

Earle



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

"Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com> wrote in news:472d2268$0$26499$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:sh7Xi.715$ck5.652@newsfe09.phx...
> ...
>> Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice
>> munged up the attributions, as usual.
>
> Most of your posts here are about Bill. Nothing about Jeeps at all. I
> did notice that once you posted something about Waldron. Do you have a
> life?

I've noticed most of your poasts are about slurping Goat----er Bill.
Nothing about any wrongs the senile ---- has done. I did notice you aren't
a complete ------- at every moment. Do you have a neuron, peckerhead?

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

"Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com> wrote in news:472d2268$0$26499$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:sh7Xi.715$ck5.652@newsfe09.phx...
> ...
>> Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice
>> munged up the attributions, as usual.
>
> Most of your posts here are about Bill. Nothing about Jeeps at all. I
> did notice that once you posted something about Waldron. Do you have a
> life?

I've noticed most of your poasts are about slurping Goat----er Bill.
Nothing about any wrongs the senile ---- has done. I did notice you aren't
a complete ------- at every moment. Do you have a neuron, peckerhead?

Re: Bill Hughs, YOUR the best!
 

"Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com> wrote in news:472d2268$0$26499$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:sh7Xi.715$ck5.652@newsfe09.phx...
> ...
>> Sorry, I was referring to the OP. Bill's top-posting cowardice
>> munged up the attributions, as usual.
>
> Most of your posts here are about Bill. Nothing about Jeeps at all. I
> did notice that once you posted something about Waldron. Do you have a
> life?

I've noticed most of your poasts are about slurping Goat----er Bill.
Nothing about any wrongs the senile ---- has done. I did notice you aren't
a complete ------- at every moment. Do you have a neuron, peckerhead?