big rigs of combat
 

for those of you who cant download the rip, it will be on tonight at 8pm
(EST) on the history channel.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com

Re: big rigs of combat
 

ignore the thread, this version is about tanks, not jeeps.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com

"Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@A0L.com> wrote in message
news:lqgYa.4584$2x.184167@twister.southeast.rr.com ...
> for those of you who cant download the rip, it will be on tonight at 8pm
> (EST) on the history channel.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
>
>

Re: big rigs of combat
 

Would still like to see that...
Nick

"Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@A0L.com> wrote in message
news:ULgYa.4609$2x.187127@twister.southeast.rr.com ...
> ignore the thread, this version is about tanks, not jeeps.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@A0L.com> wrote in message
> news:lqgYa.4584$2x.184167@twister.southeast.rr.com ...
> > for those of you who cant download the rip, it will be on tonight at 8pm
> > (EST) on the history channel.
> >
> > --
> > Nathan W. Collier
> > http://7SlotGrille.com
> >
> >
>
>

Re: big rigs of combat
 

"Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@A0L.com> wrote in message
news:4qhYa.4622$2x.198715@twister.southeast.rr.com ...
> "Nick N" <nnote@despammed.com> wrote in message
> news:3hhYa.37427$Bp2.24493@fed1read07...
> > Would still like to see that...
>
> if i would have known that i would have ripped it.

"Big rigs" Yea, that could be a tank.

> <sigh>.....fwiw i did get the entire '74 fight between ali and foreman
last
> night. :-)

Yuck

> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
>
>

Re: big rigs of combat
 

"Kim" <kim@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:j4jYa.9125$dk4.380799@typhoon.sonic.net...
> "Big rigs" Yea, that could be a tank.

the one on jeeps shared the title (with different sub-titles). apparently
its a series. when i saw "big rigs of combat" listed i didnt know the
difference.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com

Re: big rigs of combat
 

"Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@A0L.com> wrote in message
news:ULgYa.4609$2x.187127@twister.southeast.rr.com ...
> ignore the thread, this version is about tanks, not jeeps.

If that's the one I saw last night it includes tanks, jeeps and humvees.

Re: big rigs of combat
 

Approximately 8/7/03 05:59, Stan R. Day uttered for posterity:

> "Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@A0L.com> wrote in message
> news:ULgYa.4609$2x.187127@twister.southeast.rr.com ...
>> ignore the thread, this version is about tanks, not jeeps.
>
> If that's the one I saw last night it includes tanks, jeeps and humvees.

Including the original bantam and the notoriously "flipper"
models of the '60s with the independent suspension so bad that
the commanding general of White Sands banned them from all
off-road use and required refresher driving courses on the
differences between them and the older solid models. The
solid axle model jeeps had all been fitted with full roll
cages that were about 4 feet high and went all the way
from the driver/passenger area to the rear of the vehicle.
[Great fun to roll one down a sand dune....]