Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here? (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/any-newer-land-cruiser-owners-here-24210/)

Handywired 01-24-2005 03:54 AM

Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing, etc
a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The TJ is
too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.

I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good as to
justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000 Cherokee
with 60K miles!!

Thanks for any help!


-jeff

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 01-24-2005 02:03 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
NOPE! Japanese rice burners are a violation of our charter:
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+willys
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Handywired wrote:
>
> I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing, etc
> a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The TJ is
> too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>
> I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good as to
> justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000 Cherokee
> with 60K miles!!
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
> -jeff


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 01-24-2005 02:03 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
NOPE! Japanese rice burners are a violation of our charter:
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+willys
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Handywired wrote:
>
> I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing, etc
> a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The TJ is
> too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>
> I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good as to
> justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000 Cherokee
> with 60K miles!!
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
> -jeff


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 01-24-2005 02:03 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
NOPE! Japanese rice burners are a violation of our charter:
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+willys
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Handywired wrote:
>
> I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing, etc
> a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The TJ is
> too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>
> I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good as to
> justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000 Cherokee
> with 60K miles!!
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
> -jeff


Jeff Lowe 01-24-2005 02:46 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
Unless they are Mitsubishi Jeeps.

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:

> NOPE! Japanese rice burners are a violation of our charter:
> ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+willys
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Handywired wrote:
>
>>I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing, etc
>>a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The TJ is
>>too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>>
>>I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good as to
>>justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000 Cherokee
>>with 60K miles!!
>>
>>Thanks for any help!
>>
>>-jeff


Jeff Lowe 01-24-2005 02:46 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
Unless they are Mitsubishi Jeeps.

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:

> NOPE! Japanese rice burners are a violation of our charter:
> ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+willys
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Handywired wrote:
>
>>I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing, etc
>>a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The TJ is
>>too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>>
>>I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good as to
>>justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000 Cherokee
>>with 60K miles!!
>>
>>Thanks for any help!
>>
>>-jeff


Jeff Lowe 01-24-2005 02:46 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
Unless they are Mitsubishi Jeeps.

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:

> NOPE! Japanese rice burners are a violation of our charter:
> ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+willys
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Handywired wrote:
>
>>I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing, etc
>>a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The TJ is
>>too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>>
>>I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good as to
>>justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000 Cherokee
>>with 60K miles!!
>>
>>Thanks for any help!
>>
>>-jeff


Jeff Strickland 01-24-2005 03:28 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
There are no Land Cruiser owners here. That is, ther emight be a few, but
this group does not attract them because they have a Land Cruiser, they come
here because they also have a Jeep brand product.




"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20050124035425.23044.00000280@mb-m01.aol.com...
> I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing,

etc
> a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The

TJ is
> too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>
> I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good

as to
> justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000

Cherokee
> with 60K miles!!
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
>
> -jeff




Jeff Strickland 01-24-2005 03:28 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
There are no Land Cruiser owners here. That is, ther emight be a few, but
this group does not attract them because they have a Land Cruiser, they come
here because they also have a Jeep brand product.




"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20050124035425.23044.00000280@mb-m01.aol.com...
> I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing,

etc
> a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The

TJ is
> too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>
> I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good

as to
> justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000

Cherokee
> with 60K miles!!
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
>
> -jeff




Jeff Strickland 01-24-2005 03:28 PM

Re: Any (newer) Land Cruiser owners here?
 
There are no Land Cruiser owners here. That is, ther emight be a few, but
this group does not attract them because they have a Land Cruiser, they come
here because they also have a Jeep brand product.




"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20050124035425.23044.00000280@mb-m01.aol.com...
> I've been considering one as a family "tank". We get out camping, skiing,

etc
> a lot and somehow my other 3 vehicles are not quite getting it done! The

TJ is
> too small, the Volvo is 2wd, and the Nissan 4x4 is too old.
>
> I am looking at mid-90's models. How are they? Are they really so good

as to
> justif the high prices? A '94 with150K can sell for as much as a 2000

Cherokee
> with 60K miles!!
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
>
> -jeff





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.04152 seconds with 5 queries