Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!! (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/76-cj-7-axle-conversion-34050/)

Jason Backshall 12-29-2005 12:17 AM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
I see a lot of 'Optionals'...


"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43B33B7C.FD43676B@cox.net...
> The Javelin ran over four hundred horsepower in front of your axle:
> http://www.lhmopars.com/MOPAR_Ads/19...avelin_ad.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
>>
>> Okay, first things first: Don't kill me for asking:)
>> Now... I want to do an axle conversion and need some advice on what to
>> swap (Dana 30 frt/AMC 20 Rr, 11" drums). I've done a lot of searching
>> and
>> scrounging but can't find the right axles. A friend in a tranny shop
>> recommends 10/12 bolt Chevy's. Another guy want $800 for Dana 44's from
>> a
>> 79 Cherokee. Another guy who customs Jeeps wants to unload a 14 bolt
>> rear
>> and 44 front for $600 (and $1500 in labor).
>> I've read everything from a 8.8 Ford rear to how Scout axles have
>> unacceptable drawbacks (for me at least). I either can't find the silver
>> bullet website or am overwhelmed with a million "Hey! I did this and
>> don't
>> like this about it" hits.
>> Can you guys give me some solid advice on axle swaps? I don't mind if
>> it's wide since that'll help handling. Don't care if it's spring over or
>> under either since I live in the flatlands. I'd really like better
>> braking,
>> though. I just don't want to go straight to a machinist off the bat.
>> P.S. tire size and gearing are a thought as well since I have a NV4500;
>> granny 1st is unuseably low right now and wiiiide gear ratio makes it
>> drive
>> like a dump truck:)
>> Regards,
>> Jim




Greg 12-29-2005 10:47 AM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
I didn't see you mention Ford 9", once installed it has the lowest priced,
easiest to install, widest range of parts, daughter got one for her YJ from
a 69 ford thunderbird, think it was 69, only 3" wider so didn't do any
cutting, best thing about it is that if going to a machanic for gear swaps,
lockers etc. you just pull 3rd member and take it to him. I'd hate to tell
you that my daughter got her 9" from Pick Your Part in Calgary Alberta two
years ago, boxing day sale, all front or rear ends $29.00, all trannys
$39.00, all engines $49.00, only thing was you had to pull it yourself, no
gas or electric tools alowed, and it was minus 22 C, that's about minus 3 F.

"Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote in message
news:dovbq1$dhd$1@news.utelfla.com...
>1 Pockets not very deep at the moment but time heals all wounds. Arms are
>kinda lanky but not sure what that has to do with axles:)
> 2 Lookin' for as capable as I can get but don't do anything radical;
> mostly inch-worm, creepy-crawly kinda stuff and camping.
> 3 Lockers are better but could live with open diffs til can upgrade later.
> 4 Got 33's for the past many years. Could go bigger to keep dimensions
> right. Not interested in size, though, just ability.
> 5 Just swapped in a Chevrolet 350 w/TPI, headers, etc. It's backed up
> with a NV4500 & Dana 300. Plenty of torque and power. Gonna upgrade it
> again and the numbers will go up (only 'cause I haven't rebuilt yet).
> 6 Outstanding question. I've owned it for somewhere around 13 years now
> and would never part with it. It's a sentimental hobby car since my son
> used to love beating it with a hammer as a toddler (lost him shortly
> thereafter:( All I can tell people is, "It's a Jeep thing. You wouldn't
> understand." Anyway, it's not meant to be a bogger, rock-crawler or
> pit-beater. It's a quest for the best all around 4WD I can build based on
> design; 44" tires and 10' tall isn't cool unless it's optimum (33" tires
> were it due to handling and brakes).
> Basically looking for the best starting alternative to look for and have
> all the time in the world to upgrade/modify from there. I have two little
> girls to beat on it with a wrench now:)
> Best Regards,
> Jim
>
> "Carl" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7_SdnRVY1bcHsC7enZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> Well, a lot depends on what you want to do.
>> 1. How deep are your pockets, and how long are your arms?
>> 2. What type of terrain do you intend to conquer?
>> 3. Do you want lockers?
>> 4. What size tires do you want to run?
>> 5. What engine do you have?
>> 6. What is your overall goal for this Jeep?
>>
>> I ran my 89 Wrangler 2.5L on 33's with stock axles (Dana 30, Dana 35)
>> without any axle problems. Generally stock axles are OK up to 33" tires
>> w/o lockers. I've heard of people daring for 34's and 35's, but I
>> probably wouldn't go that far. Lock it up and wave goodbye.
>>
>> Unless you want to lift your Jeep, keep it Spring-under. If you go
>> spring-over, you will get quite a bit of lift, on average about 6". If
>> you do want to lift it, during the axle swap is the time.
>>
>> Anyhow, assuming you want lockers and/or tires above 33", any of the
>> axles you mentioned will be just fine, I would pick the one You can get
>> the best deal on. Remember that a full-size truck's axle will need to be
>> narrowed to fit under your Jeep properly, it'll look silly and probably
>> be illegal someway, somehow if you don't have it narrowed.
>>
>> I suppose if you really wanted to pick one rear that would be the best
>> bang for the buck, it would be an 8.8" rear from a 96 and up Ford
>> Explorer and keep the Dana 30 front. The 8.8 is pretty close to the same
>> width as your front axle, has larger, stronger tubes and axle shafts,
>> than your AMC 20 and has factory rear disc brakes. I'm not sure if your
>> CJ has the wide-track or narrow-track axles, but someone who knows will
>> likely chime in.
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>> "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote in message
>> news:dov91b$b73$1@news.utelfla.com...
>>> Okay, first things first: Don't kill me for asking:)
>>> Now... I want to do an axle conversion and need some advice on what to
>>> swap (Dana 30 frt/AMC 20 Rr, 11" drums). I've done a lot of searching
>>> and scrounging but can't find the right axles. A friend in a tranny
>>> shop recommends 10/12 bolt Chevy's. Another guy want $800 for Dana 44's
>>> from a 79 Cherokee. Another guy who customs Jeeps wants to unload a 14
>>> bolt rear and 44 front for $600 (and $1500 in labor).
>>> I've read everything from a 8.8 Ford rear to how Scout axles have
>>> unacceptable drawbacks (for me at least). I either can't find the
>>> silver bullet website or am overwhelmed with a million "Hey! I did this
>>> and don't like this about it" hits.
>>> Can you guys give me some solid advice on axle swaps? I don't mind if
>>> it's wide since that'll help handling. Don't care if it's spring over
>>> or under either since I live in the flatlands. I'd really like better
>>> braking, though. I just don't want to go straight to a machinist off
>>> the bat.
>>> P.S. tire size and gearing are a thought as well since I have a NV4500;
>>> granny 1st is unuseably low right now and wiiiide gear ratio makes it
>>> drive like a dump truck:)
>>> Regards,
>>> Jim
>>>

>>
>>

>
>




Greg 12-29-2005 10:47 AM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
I didn't see you mention Ford 9", once installed it has the lowest priced,
easiest to install, widest range of parts, daughter got one for her YJ from
a 69 ford thunderbird, think it was 69, only 3" wider so didn't do any
cutting, best thing about it is that if going to a machanic for gear swaps,
lockers etc. you just pull 3rd member and take it to him. I'd hate to tell
you that my daughter got her 9" from Pick Your Part in Calgary Alberta two
years ago, boxing day sale, all front or rear ends $29.00, all trannys
$39.00, all engines $49.00, only thing was you had to pull it yourself, no
gas or electric tools alowed, and it was minus 22 C, that's about minus 3 F.

"Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote in message
news:dovbq1$dhd$1@news.utelfla.com...
>1 Pockets not very deep at the moment but time heals all wounds. Arms are
>kinda lanky but not sure what that has to do with axles:)
> 2 Lookin' for as capable as I can get but don't do anything radical;
> mostly inch-worm, creepy-crawly kinda stuff and camping.
> 3 Lockers are better but could live with open diffs til can upgrade later.
> 4 Got 33's for the past many years. Could go bigger to keep dimensions
> right. Not interested in size, though, just ability.
> 5 Just swapped in a Chevrolet 350 w/TPI, headers, etc. It's backed up
> with a NV4500 & Dana 300. Plenty of torque and power. Gonna upgrade it
> again and the numbers will go up (only 'cause I haven't rebuilt yet).
> 6 Outstanding question. I've owned it for somewhere around 13 years now
> and would never part with it. It's a sentimental hobby car since my son
> used to love beating it with a hammer as a toddler (lost him shortly
> thereafter:( All I can tell people is, "It's a Jeep thing. You wouldn't
> understand." Anyway, it's not meant to be a bogger, rock-crawler or
> pit-beater. It's a quest for the best all around 4WD I can build based on
> design; 44" tires and 10' tall isn't cool unless it's optimum (33" tires
> were it due to handling and brakes).
> Basically looking for the best starting alternative to look for and have
> all the time in the world to upgrade/modify from there. I have two little
> girls to beat on it with a wrench now:)
> Best Regards,
> Jim
>
> "Carl" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7_SdnRVY1bcHsC7enZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> Well, a lot depends on what you want to do.
>> 1. How deep are your pockets, and how long are your arms?
>> 2. What type of terrain do you intend to conquer?
>> 3. Do you want lockers?
>> 4. What size tires do you want to run?
>> 5. What engine do you have?
>> 6. What is your overall goal for this Jeep?
>>
>> I ran my 89 Wrangler 2.5L on 33's with stock axles (Dana 30, Dana 35)
>> without any axle problems. Generally stock axles are OK up to 33" tires
>> w/o lockers. I've heard of people daring for 34's and 35's, but I
>> probably wouldn't go that far. Lock it up and wave goodbye.
>>
>> Unless you want to lift your Jeep, keep it Spring-under. If you go
>> spring-over, you will get quite a bit of lift, on average about 6". If
>> you do want to lift it, during the axle swap is the time.
>>
>> Anyhow, assuming you want lockers and/or tires above 33", any of the
>> axles you mentioned will be just fine, I would pick the one You can get
>> the best deal on. Remember that a full-size truck's axle will need to be
>> narrowed to fit under your Jeep properly, it'll look silly and probably
>> be illegal someway, somehow if you don't have it narrowed.
>>
>> I suppose if you really wanted to pick one rear that would be the best
>> bang for the buck, it would be an 8.8" rear from a 96 and up Ford
>> Explorer and keep the Dana 30 front. The 8.8 is pretty close to the same
>> width as your front axle, has larger, stronger tubes and axle shafts,
>> than your AMC 20 and has factory rear disc brakes. I'm not sure if your
>> CJ has the wide-track or narrow-track axles, but someone who knows will
>> likely chime in.
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>> "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote in message
>> news:dov91b$b73$1@news.utelfla.com...
>>> Okay, first things first: Don't kill me for asking:)
>>> Now... I want to do an axle conversion and need some advice on what to
>>> swap (Dana 30 frt/AMC 20 Rr, 11" drums). I've done a lot of searching
>>> and scrounging but can't find the right axles. A friend in a tranny
>>> shop recommends 10/12 bolt Chevy's. Another guy want $800 for Dana 44's
>>> from a 79 Cherokee. Another guy who customs Jeeps wants to unload a 14
>>> bolt rear and 44 front for $600 (and $1500 in labor).
>>> I've read everything from a 8.8 Ford rear to how Scout axles have
>>> unacceptable drawbacks (for me at least). I either can't find the
>>> silver bullet website or am overwhelmed with a million "Hey! I did this
>>> and don't like this about it" hits.
>>> Can you guys give me some solid advice on axle swaps? I don't mind if
>>> it's wide since that'll help handling. Don't care if it's spring over
>>> or under either since I live in the flatlands. I'd really like better
>>> braking, though. I just don't want to go straight to a machinist off
>>> the bat.
>>> P.S. tire size and gearing are a thought as well since I have a NV4500;
>>> granny 1st is unuseably low right now and wiiiide gear ratio makes it
>>> drive like a dump truck:)
>>> Regards,
>>> Jim
>>>

>>
>>

>
>




Greg 12-29-2005 10:47 AM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
I didn't see you mention Ford 9", once installed it has the lowest priced,
easiest to install, widest range of parts, daughter got one for her YJ from
a 69 ford thunderbird, think it was 69, only 3" wider so didn't do any
cutting, best thing about it is that if going to a machanic for gear swaps,
lockers etc. you just pull 3rd member and take it to him. I'd hate to tell
you that my daughter got her 9" from Pick Your Part in Calgary Alberta two
years ago, boxing day sale, all front or rear ends $29.00, all trannys
$39.00, all engines $49.00, only thing was you had to pull it yourself, no
gas or electric tools alowed, and it was minus 22 C, that's about minus 3 F.

"Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote in message
news:dovbq1$dhd$1@news.utelfla.com...
>1 Pockets not very deep at the moment but time heals all wounds. Arms are
>kinda lanky but not sure what that has to do with axles:)
> 2 Lookin' for as capable as I can get but don't do anything radical;
> mostly inch-worm, creepy-crawly kinda stuff and camping.
> 3 Lockers are better but could live with open diffs til can upgrade later.
> 4 Got 33's for the past many years. Could go bigger to keep dimensions
> right. Not interested in size, though, just ability.
> 5 Just swapped in a Chevrolet 350 w/TPI, headers, etc. It's backed up
> with a NV4500 & Dana 300. Plenty of torque and power. Gonna upgrade it
> again and the numbers will go up (only 'cause I haven't rebuilt yet).
> 6 Outstanding question. I've owned it for somewhere around 13 years now
> and would never part with it. It's a sentimental hobby car since my son
> used to love beating it with a hammer as a toddler (lost him shortly
> thereafter:( All I can tell people is, "It's a Jeep thing. You wouldn't
> understand." Anyway, it's not meant to be a bogger, rock-crawler or
> pit-beater. It's a quest for the best all around 4WD I can build based on
> design; 44" tires and 10' tall isn't cool unless it's optimum (33" tires
> were it due to handling and brakes).
> Basically looking for the best starting alternative to look for and have
> all the time in the world to upgrade/modify from there. I have two little
> girls to beat on it with a wrench now:)
> Best Regards,
> Jim
>
> "Carl" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7_SdnRVY1bcHsC7enZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> Well, a lot depends on what you want to do.
>> 1. How deep are your pockets, and how long are your arms?
>> 2. What type of terrain do you intend to conquer?
>> 3. Do you want lockers?
>> 4. What size tires do you want to run?
>> 5. What engine do you have?
>> 6. What is your overall goal for this Jeep?
>>
>> I ran my 89 Wrangler 2.5L on 33's with stock axles (Dana 30, Dana 35)
>> without any axle problems. Generally stock axles are OK up to 33" tires
>> w/o lockers. I've heard of people daring for 34's and 35's, but I
>> probably wouldn't go that far. Lock it up and wave goodbye.
>>
>> Unless you want to lift your Jeep, keep it Spring-under. If you go
>> spring-over, you will get quite a bit of lift, on average about 6". If
>> you do want to lift it, during the axle swap is the time.
>>
>> Anyhow, assuming you want lockers and/or tires above 33", any of the
>> axles you mentioned will be just fine, I would pick the one You can get
>> the best deal on. Remember that a full-size truck's axle will need to be
>> narrowed to fit under your Jeep properly, it'll look silly and probably
>> be illegal someway, somehow if you don't have it narrowed.
>>
>> I suppose if you really wanted to pick one rear that would be the best
>> bang for the buck, it would be an 8.8" rear from a 96 and up Ford
>> Explorer and keep the Dana 30 front. The 8.8 is pretty close to the same
>> width as your front axle, has larger, stronger tubes and axle shafts,
>> than your AMC 20 and has factory rear disc brakes. I'm not sure if your
>> CJ has the wide-track or narrow-track axles, but someone who knows will
>> likely chime in.
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>> "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote in message
>> news:dov91b$b73$1@news.utelfla.com...
>>> Okay, first things first: Don't kill me for asking:)
>>> Now... I want to do an axle conversion and need some advice on what to
>>> swap (Dana 30 frt/AMC 20 Rr, 11" drums). I've done a lot of searching
>>> and scrounging but can't find the right axles. A friend in a tranny
>>> shop recommends 10/12 bolt Chevy's. Another guy want $800 for Dana 44's
>>> from a 79 Cherokee. Another guy who customs Jeeps wants to unload a 14
>>> bolt rear and 44 front for $600 (and $1500 in labor).
>>> I've read everything from a 8.8 Ford rear to how Scout axles have
>>> unacceptable drawbacks (for me at least). I either can't find the
>>> silver bullet website or am overwhelmed with a million "Hey! I did this
>>> and don't like this about it" hits.
>>> Can you guys give me some solid advice on axle swaps? I don't mind if
>>> it's wide since that'll help handling. Don't care if it's spring over
>>> or under either since I live in the flatlands. I'd really like better
>>> braking, though. I just don't want to go straight to a machinist off
>>> the bat.
>>> P.S. tire size and gearing are a thought as well since I have a NV4500;
>>> granny 1st is unuseably low right now and wiiiide gear ratio makes it
>>> drive like a dump truck:)
>>> Regards,
>>> Jim
>>>

>>
>>

>
>




Dave Milne 12-30-2005 07:23 PM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
Who would have thought after that, that the 360 would be putting out 0.41 hp
per ci by 1991, about the same as manufacturers were managing in the early
1930's.

Dave

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43B33B7C.FD43676B@cox.net...
> The Javelin ran over four hundred horsepower in front of your axle:
> http://www.lhmopars.com/MOPAR_Ads/19...avelin_ad.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > Okay, first things first: Don't kill me for asking:)
> > Now... I want to do an axle conversion and need some advice on what

to
> > swap (Dana 30 frt/AMC 20 Rr, 11" drums). I've done a lot of searching

and
> > scrounging but can't find the right axles. A friend in a tranny shop
> > recommends 10/12 bolt Chevy's. Another guy want $800 for Dana 44's from

a
> > 79 Cherokee. Another guy who customs Jeeps wants to unload a 14 bolt

rear
> > and 44 front for $600 (and $1500 in labor).
> > I've read everything from a 8.8 Ford rear to how Scout axles have
> > unacceptable drawbacks (for me at least). I either can't find the

silver
> > bullet website or am overwhelmed with a million "Hey! I did this and

don't
> > like this about it" hits.
> > Can you guys give me some solid advice on axle swaps? I don't mind if
> > it's wide since that'll help handling. Don't care if it's spring over

or
> > under either since I live in the flatlands. I'd really like better

braking,
> > though. I just don't want to go straight to a machinist off the bat.
> > P.S. tire size and gearing are a thought as well since I have a NV4500;
> > granny 1st is unuseably low right now and wiiiide gear ratio makes it

drive
> > like a dump truck:)
> > Regards,
> > Jim




Dave Milne 12-30-2005 07:23 PM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
Who would have thought after that, that the 360 would be putting out 0.41 hp
per ci by 1991, about the same as manufacturers were managing in the early
1930's.

Dave

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43B33B7C.FD43676B@cox.net...
> The Javelin ran over four hundred horsepower in front of your axle:
> http://www.lhmopars.com/MOPAR_Ads/19...avelin_ad.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > Okay, first things first: Don't kill me for asking:)
> > Now... I want to do an axle conversion and need some advice on what

to
> > swap (Dana 30 frt/AMC 20 Rr, 11" drums). I've done a lot of searching

and
> > scrounging but can't find the right axles. A friend in a tranny shop
> > recommends 10/12 bolt Chevy's. Another guy want $800 for Dana 44's from

a
> > 79 Cherokee. Another guy who customs Jeeps wants to unload a 14 bolt

rear
> > and 44 front for $600 (and $1500 in labor).
> > I've read everything from a 8.8 Ford rear to how Scout axles have
> > unacceptable drawbacks (for me at least). I either can't find the

silver
> > bullet website or am overwhelmed with a million "Hey! I did this and

don't
> > like this about it" hits.
> > Can you guys give me some solid advice on axle swaps? I don't mind if
> > it's wide since that'll help handling. Don't care if it's spring over

or
> > under either since I live in the flatlands. I'd really like better

braking,
> > though. I just don't want to go straight to a machinist off the bat.
> > P.S. tire size and gearing are a thought as well since I have a NV4500;
> > granny 1st is unuseably low right now and wiiiide gear ratio makes it

drive
> > like a dump truck:)
> > Regards,
> > Jim




Dave Milne 12-30-2005 07:23 PM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
Who would have thought after that, that the 360 would be putting out 0.41 hp
per ci by 1991, about the same as manufacturers were managing in the early
1930's.

Dave

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43B33B7C.FD43676B@cox.net...
> The Javelin ran over four hundred horsepower in front of your axle:
> http://www.lhmopars.com/MOPAR_Ads/19...avelin_ad.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Drink wrote:
> >
> > Okay, first things first: Don't kill me for asking:)
> > Now... I want to do an axle conversion and need some advice on what

to
> > swap (Dana 30 frt/AMC 20 Rr, 11" drums). I've done a lot of searching

and
> > scrounging but can't find the right axles. A friend in a tranny shop
> > recommends 10/12 bolt Chevy's. Another guy want $800 for Dana 44's from

a
> > 79 Cherokee. Another guy who customs Jeeps wants to unload a 14 bolt

rear
> > and 44 front for $600 (and $1500 in labor).
> > I've read everything from a 8.8 Ford rear to how Scout axles have
> > unacceptable drawbacks (for me at least). I either can't find the

silver
> > bullet website or am overwhelmed with a million "Hey! I did this and

don't
> > like this about it" hits.
> > Can you guys give me some solid advice on axle swaps? I don't mind if
> > it's wide since that'll help handling. Don't care if it's spring over

or
> > under either since I live in the flatlands. I'd really like better

braking,
> > though. I just don't want to go straight to a machinist off the bat.
> > P.S. tire size and gearing are a thought as well since I have a NV4500;
> > granny 1st is unuseably low right now and wiiiide gear ratio makes it

drive
> > like a dump truck:)
> > Regards,
> > Jim




L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 12-30-2005 08:15 PM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
These push rod engines are starting to sneak back in here.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Who would have thought after that, that the 360 would be putting out 0.41 hp
> per ci by 1991, about the same as manufacturers were managing in the early
> 1930's.
>
> Dave


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 12-30-2005 08:15 PM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
These push rod engines are starting to sneak back in here.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Who would have thought after that, that the 360 would be putting out 0.41 hp
> per ci by 1991, about the same as manufacturers were managing in the early
> 1930's.
>
> Dave


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 12-30-2005 08:15 PM

Re: '76 CJ-7 Axle Conversion??!!
 
These push rod engines are starting to sneak back in here.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Who would have thought after that, that the 360 would be putting out 0.41 hp
> per ci by 1991, about the same as manufacturers were managing in the early
> 1930's.
>
> Dave



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.15300 seconds with 5 queries