|
Re: 2006 TJ?
Yeah Patrick, I don't like those wheels either. I do like the rocky
moutain jeep though. Not really into the big decals on either. Those seats look nice. |
Re: 2006 TJ?
Yeah Patrick, I don't like those wheels either. I do like the rocky
moutain jeep though. Not really into the big decals on either. Those seats look nice. |
Re: 2006 TJ?
That model in white was attractive but the best feature was the seat cover.
http://www.tvacres.com/images/daisy_duke_jeep_legs.jpg The graphic and gold wheels only look nice on a few colors in my opinion... and I am sure that has changed over the past 25 years. -- Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM) 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be. .. "69strat" <budda66f@aol.com> wrote in message news:1128957123.998280.117330@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... > Yeah Patrick, I don't like those wheels either. I do like the rocky > moutain jeep though. Not really into the big decals on either. Those > seats look nice. > |
Re: 2006 TJ?
That model in white was attractive but the best feature was the seat cover.
http://www.tvacres.com/images/daisy_duke_jeep_legs.jpg The graphic and gold wheels only look nice on a few colors in my opinion... and I am sure that has changed over the past 25 years. -- Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM) 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be. .. "69strat" <budda66f@aol.com> wrote in message news:1128957123.998280.117330@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... > Yeah Patrick, I don't like those wheels either. I do like the rocky > moutain jeep though. Not really into the big decals on either. Those > seats look nice. > |
Re: 2006 TJ?
That model in white was attractive but the best feature was the seat cover.
http://www.tvacres.com/images/daisy_duke_jeep_legs.jpg The graphic and gold wheels only look nice on a few colors in my opinion... and I am sure that has changed over the past 25 years. -- Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM) 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be. .. "69strat" <budda66f@aol.com> wrote in message news:1128957123.998280.117330@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... > Yeah Patrick, I don't like those wheels either. I do like the rocky > moutain jeep though. Not really into the big decals on either. Those > seats look nice. > |
Re: 2006 TJ?
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:1ge2f.2386$MN6.313@fed1read04... > That photo is close to what the 2007 will look like. You're kidding me right? *wrinkles up nose* |
Re: 2006 TJ?
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:1ge2f.2386$MN6.313@fed1read04... > That photo is close to what the 2007 will look like. You're kidding me right? *wrinkles up nose* |
Re: 2006 TJ?
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:1ge2f.2386$MN6.313@fed1read04... > That photo is close to what the 2007 will look like. You're kidding me right? *wrinkles up nose* |
Re: 2006 TJ?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:fM-dnSxmvtYbEdTeRVn-vg@comcast.com... > Bill's been renaming that file every year since 2002. Don't pay him no > mind... > Crisis averted :D *phew* |
Re: 2006 TJ?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:fM-dnSxmvtYbEdTeRVn-vg@comcast.com... > Bill's been renaming that file every year since 2002. Don't pay him no > mind... > Crisis averted :D *phew* |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands