Re: 1996 Cherokee 4.0 I6 timing mark. ??
 

On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:12:54 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>bllsht wrote:
>
>> That picture was the only one I could find, and it's not a 4.0L, but
>> it was meant to indicate loacation, and that's what it does. It may
>> not look exactly the same, and it's hard to see with the serpentine
>> belt in the way, but it is there whether YOU can see it or not.
>>
>
>Well you are right, I went out and looked again and still had no marks
>so I took a scraper to the area and sure enough, the marks are down
>there under the mud and crud. Mine have never been cleaned because they
>aren't used normally.
>
>Mike

So for the record then, you posted the "complete --------", not me.
Correct?

Re: 1996 Cherokee 4.0 I6 timing mark. ??
 

On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:12:54 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>bllsht wrote:
>
>> That picture was the only one I could find, and it's not a 4.0L, but
>> it was meant to indicate loacation, and that's what it does. It may
>> not look exactly the same, and it's hard to see with the serpentine
>> belt in the way, but it is there whether YOU can see it or not.
>>
>
>Well you are right, I went out and looked again and still had no marks
>so I took a scraper to the area and sure enough, the marks are down
>there under the mud and crud. Mine have never been cleaned because they
>aren't used normally.
>
>Mike

So for the record then, you posted the "complete --------", not me.
Correct?

Re: 1996 Cherokee 4.0 I6 timing mark. ??
 

On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:12:54 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>bllsht wrote:
>
>> That picture was the only one I could find, and it's not a 4.0L, but
>> it was meant to indicate loacation, and that's what it does. It may
>> not look exactly the same, and it's hard to see with the serpentine
>> belt in the way, but it is there whether YOU can see it or not.
>>
>
>Well you are right, I went out and looked again and still had no marks
>so I took a scraper to the area and sure enough, the marks are down
>there under the mud and crud. Mine have never been cleaned because they
>aren't used normally.
>
>Mike

So for the record then, you posted the "complete --------", not me.
Correct?