Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   1971 Commando - what to look for (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/1971-commando-what-look-11305/)

Ron Loewy 02-12-2004 07:21 PM

1971 Commando - what to look for
 
It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it
caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story
for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be
in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible
top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust
on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe
this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too
close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this
aspect of the car.

It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and
radio are not, but everything else seems to be right.

So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but
what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject?

Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have
not been driving vintage cars in a while?

Thanks for any pointers.

Ron.



L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 02-12-2004 08:06 PM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Ron Loewy wrote:
>
> It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it
> caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story
> for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be
> in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible
> top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust
> on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe
> this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too
> close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this
> aspect of the car.
>
> It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and
> radio are not, but everything else seems to be right.
>
> So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but
> what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject?
>
> Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have
> not been driving vintage cars in a while?
>
> Thanks for any pointers.
>
> Ron.


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 02-12-2004 08:06 PM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Ron Loewy wrote:
>
> It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it
> caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story
> for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be
> in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible
> top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust
> on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe
> this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too
> close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this
> aspect of the car.
>
> It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and
> radio are not, but everything else seems to be right.
>
> So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but
> what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject?
>
> Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have
> not been driving vintage cars in a while?
>
> Thanks for any pointers.
>
> Ron.


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 02-12-2004 08:06 PM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Ron Loewy wrote:
>
> It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it
> caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story
> for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be
> in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible
> top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust
> on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe
> this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too
> close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this
> aspect of the car.
>
> It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and
> radio are not, but everything else seems to be right.
>
> So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but
> what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject?
>
> Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have
> not been driving vintage cars in a while?
>
> Thanks for any pointers.
>
> Ron.


Kevin Sperle 02-13-2004 10:47 AM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get
up and change the channel on the TV.

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:402C2318.FF4E9AB2@cox.net...
> That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
> http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Ron Loewy wrote:
> >
> > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and

it
> > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a

story
> > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to

be
> > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop,

convertible
> > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any

rust
> > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe
> > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too
> > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify

this
> > aspect of the car.
> >
> > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel

and
> > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right.
> >
> > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but
> > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the

subject?
> >
> > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I

have
> > not been driving vintage cars in a while?
> >
> > Thanks for any pointers.
> >
> > Ron.




Kevin Sperle 02-13-2004 10:47 AM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get
up and change the channel on the TV.

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:402C2318.FF4E9AB2@cox.net...
> That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
> http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Ron Loewy wrote:
> >
> > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and

it
> > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a

story
> > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to

be
> > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop,

convertible
> > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any

rust
> > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe
> > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too
> > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify

this
> > aspect of the car.
> >
> > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel

and
> > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right.
> >
> > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but
> > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the

subject?
> >
> > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I

have
> > not been driving vintage cars in a while?
> >
> > Thanks for any pointers.
> >
> > Ron.




Kevin Sperle 02-13-2004 10:47 AM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get
up and change the channel on the TV.

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:402C2318.FF4E9AB2@cox.net...
> That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
> http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Ron Loewy wrote:
> >
> > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and

it
> > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a

story
> > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to

be
> > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop,

convertible
> > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any

rust
> > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe
> > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too
> > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify

this
> > aspect of the car.
> >
> > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel

and
> > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right.
> >
> > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but
> > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the

subject?
> >
> > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I

have
> > not been driving vintage cars in a while?
> >
> > Thanks for any pointers.
> >
> > Ron.




twaldron 02-13-2004 10:54 AM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
Yeah, but there were only 3 channels to deal with. Imagine standing
there sorting thru 250!

Kevin Sperle wrote:

> Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
> without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get
> up and change the channel on the TV.


--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw

03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________


twaldron 02-13-2004 10:54 AM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
Yeah, but there were only 3 channels to deal with. Imagine standing
there sorting thru 250!

Kevin Sperle wrote:

> Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
> without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get
> up and change the channel on the TV.


--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw

03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________


twaldron 02-13-2004 10:54 AM

Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
 
Yeah, but there were only 3 channels to deal with. Imagine standing
there sorting thru 250!

Kevin Sperle wrote:

> Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
> without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get
> up and change the channel on the TV.


--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw

03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.06051 seconds with 5 queries