1971 Commando - what to look for
It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it
caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this aspect of the car. It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and radio are not, but everything else seems to be right. So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject? Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have not been driving vintage cars in a while? Thanks for any pointers. Ron. |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- Ron Loewy wrote: > > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this > aspect of the car. > > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right. > > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject? > > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have > not been driving vintage cars in a while? > > Thanks for any pointers. > > Ron. |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- Ron Loewy wrote: > > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this > aspect of the car. > > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right. > > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject? > > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have > not been driving vintage cars in a while? > > Thanks for any pointers. > > Ron. |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it:
http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- Ron Loewy wrote: > > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this > aspect of the car. > > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right. > > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject? > > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have > not been driving vintage cars in a while? > > Thanks for any pointers. > > Ron. |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get up and change the channel on the TV. "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:402C2318.FF4E9AB2@cox.net... > That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it: > http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- > > Ron Loewy wrote: > > > > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it > > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story > > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be > > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible > > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust > > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe > > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too > > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this > > aspect of the car. > > > > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and > > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right. > > > > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but > > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject? > > > > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have > > not been driving vintage cars in a while? > > > > Thanks for any pointers. > > > > Ron. |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get up and change the channel on the TV. "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:402C2318.FF4E9AB2@cox.net... > That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it: > http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- > > Ron Loewy wrote: > > > > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it > > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story > > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be > > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible > > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust > > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe > > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too > > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this > > aspect of the car. > > > > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and > > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right. > > > > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but > > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject? > > > > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have > > not been driving vintage cars in a while? > > > > Thanks for any pointers. > > > > Ron. |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished
without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get up and change the channel on the TV. "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:402C2318.FF4E9AB2@cox.net... > That's why most of us bolted the 350 Buick straight into it: > http://www.----------.com/buickV8jeep.jpg > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- > > Ron Loewy wrote: > > > > It has been a while since I owned a Jeep (My last one was a 1997 TJ and it > > caused me more problems than the CJ's I had before it, but this is a story > > for other times) - but I recently ran across a 71 V6 C-101 that seems to be > > in very nice condition. The body seems nice, it has a hardtop, convertible > > top and multiple bikini tops. The interior looks OK. I did not see any rust > > on the body. I drove it and it seems really slow and gutless - but maybe > > this is something that a tuneup will solve. Also, the seat is bolted too > > close to the steering wheel for my comfort - so I will have to modify this > > aspect of the car. > > > > It seems to be mostly original from what I can tell - the steering wheel and > > radio are not, but everything else seems to be right. > > > > So, I will obviously have it taken to be inspected for compression - but > > what else should I pay attention to? Any recommended books on the subject? > > > > Any comments on the car feeling slow and gutless? Could it be because I have > > not been driving vintage cars in a while? > > > > Thanks for any pointers. > > > > Ron. |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
Yeah, but there were only 3 channels to deal with. Imagine standing
there sorting thru 250! Kevin Sperle wrote: > Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished > without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get > up and change the channel on the TV. -- __________________________________________________ _________ tw 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5" 01 XJ Sport There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." -- Dave Barry Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940 Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose) A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase, 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II. (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email) __________________________________________________ _________ |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
Yeah, but there were only 3 channels to deal with. Imagine standing
there sorting thru 250! Kevin Sperle wrote: > Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished > without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get > up and change the channel on the TV. -- __________________________________________________ _________ tw 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5" 01 XJ Sport There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." -- Dave Barry Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940 Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose) A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase, 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II. (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email) __________________________________________________ _________ |
Re: 1971 Commando - what to look for
Yeah, but there were only 3 channels to deal with. Imagine standing
there sorting thru 250! Kevin Sperle wrote: > Oh boy, the days before digital cameras! How we got anything accomlished > without them, I can't even imagine. Being 29 I barely remeber having to get > up and change the channel on the TV. -- __________________________________________________ _________ tw 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5" 01 XJ Sport There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." -- Dave Barry Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940 Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose) A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase, 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II. (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email) __________________________________________________ _________ |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands