134a Refrigerant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Out and out gibberish
Work the problem, you don't need to know why it works.
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
360
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> See? No grasp of induction... can't even draw
> a picture. You don't have any clue about how
> to break down the calculation, even though you
> cut-and-pasted some google explanation of it.
> Did you not read the explanation, or did you
> just not understand it? What I really mean is,
> are you just lazy, or stupid? Recall that you
> posted:
>
> <>
> Now consider the area outside of the segment. That is, we want
> the area of a portion of the circle. If we measure z in degrees we
> want the portion of the circle that takes up 360 - 2z degrees of the
> circle. So, the fraction we are dealing with here is:
> </>
>
> If you drew the picture, you'd see the pie wedge...
> two of them, actually. Comprende?
>
> Is that a statement, or a question? I can't
> make sense of it either way, anyway...
>
> For the logarithm of the square of the mare?
>
> All I read is arcsin, Bill... btw, do you have any
> clue what the difference is? Could you possibly
> explain to me why anyone would need to use an
> arcsin function?
>
> I noticed that you dropped the subject of:
> > Geez, you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
> Busted your huevos thoroughly on that one!
> __
> Steve
Work the problem, you don't need to know why it works.
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
360
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> See? No grasp of induction... can't even draw
> a picture. You don't have any clue about how
> to break down the calculation, even though you
> cut-and-pasted some google explanation of it.
> Did you not read the explanation, or did you
> just not understand it? What I really mean is,
> are you just lazy, or stupid? Recall that you
> posted:
>
> <>
> Now consider the area outside of the segment. That is, we want
> the area of a portion of the circle. If we measure z in degrees we
> want the portion of the circle that takes up 360 - 2z degrees of the
> circle. So, the fraction we are dealing with here is:
> </>
>
> If you drew the picture, you'd see the pie wedge...
> two of them, actually. Comprende?
>
> Is that a statement, or a question? I can't
> make sense of it either way, anyway...
>
> For the logarithm of the square of the mare?
>
> All I read is arcsin, Bill... btw, do you have any
> clue what the difference is? Could you possibly
> explain to me why anyone would need to use an
> arcsin function?
>
> I noticed that you dropped the subject of:
> > Geez, you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
> Busted your huevos thoroughly on that one!
> __
> Steve
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Out and out gibberish
Work the problem, you don't need to know why it works.
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
360
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> See? No grasp of induction... can't even draw
> a picture. You don't have any clue about how
> to break down the calculation, even though you
> cut-and-pasted some google explanation of it.
> Did you not read the explanation, or did you
> just not understand it? What I really mean is,
> are you just lazy, or stupid? Recall that you
> posted:
>
> <>
> Now consider the area outside of the segment. That is, we want
> the area of a portion of the circle. If we measure z in degrees we
> want the portion of the circle that takes up 360 - 2z degrees of the
> circle. So, the fraction we are dealing with here is:
> </>
>
> If you drew the picture, you'd see the pie wedge...
> two of them, actually. Comprende?
>
> Is that a statement, or a question? I can't
> make sense of it either way, anyway...
>
> For the logarithm of the square of the mare?
>
> All I read is arcsin, Bill... btw, do you have any
> clue what the difference is? Could you possibly
> explain to me why anyone would need to use an
> arcsin function?
>
> I noticed that you dropped the subject of:
> > Geez, you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
> Busted your huevos thoroughly on that one!
> __
> Steve
Work the problem, you don't need to know why it works.
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
360
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> See? No grasp of induction... can't even draw
> a picture. You don't have any clue about how
> to break down the calculation, even though you
> cut-and-pasted some google explanation of it.
> Did you not read the explanation, or did you
> just not understand it? What I really mean is,
> are you just lazy, or stupid? Recall that you
> posted:
>
> <>
> Now consider the area outside of the segment. That is, we want
> the area of a portion of the circle. If we measure z in degrees we
> want the portion of the circle that takes up 360 - 2z degrees of the
> circle. So, the fraction we are dealing with here is:
> </>
>
> If you drew the picture, you'd see the pie wedge...
> two of them, actually. Comprende?
>
> Is that a statement, or a question? I can't
> make sense of it either way, anyway...
>
> For the logarithm of the square of the mare?
>
> All I read is arcsin, Bill... btw, do you have any
> clue what the difference is? Could you possibly
> explain to me why anyone would need to use an
> arcsin function?
>
> I noticed that you dropped the subject of:
> > Geez, you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
> Busted your huevos thoroughly on that one!
> __
> Steve
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Out and out gibberish
Work the problem, you don't need to know why it works.
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
360
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> See? No grasp of induction... can't even draw
> a picture. You don't have any clue about how
> to break down the calculation, even though you
> cut-and-pasted some google explanation of it.
> Did you not read the explanation, or did you
> just not understand it? What I really mean is,
> are you just lazy, or stupid? Recall that you
> posted:
>
> <>
> Now consider the area outside of the segment. That is, we want
> the area of a portion of the circle. If we measure z in degrees we
> want the portion of the circle that takes up 360 - 2z degrees of the
> circle. So, the fraction we are dealing with here is:
> </>
>
> If you drew the picture, you'd see the pie wedge...
> two of them, actually. Comprende?
>
> Is that a statement, or a question? I can't
> make sense of it either way, anyway...
>
> For the logarithm of the square of the mare?
>
> All I read is arcsin, Bill... btw, do you have any
> clue what the difference is? Could you possibly
> explain to me why anyone would need to use an
> arcsin function?
>
> I noticed that you dropped the subject of:
> > Geez, you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
> Busted your huevos thoroughly on that one!
> __
> Steve
Work the problem, you don't need to know why it works.
360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
360
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> See? No grasp of induction... can't even draw
> a picture. You don't have any clue about how
> to break down the calculation, even though you
> cut-and-pasted some google explanation of it.
> Did you not read the explanation, or did you
> just not understand it? What I really mean is,
> are you just lazy, or stupid? Recall that you
> posted:
>
> <>
> Now consider the area outside of the segment. That is, we want
> the area of a portion of the circle. If we measure z in degrees we
> want the portion of the circle that takes up 360 - 2z degrees of the
> circle. So, the fraction we are dealing with here is:
> </>
>
> If you drew the picture, you'd see the pie wedge...
> two of them, actually. Comprende?
>
> Is that a statement, or a question? I can't
> make sense of it either way, anyway...
>
> For the logarithm of the square of the mare?
>
> All I read is arcsin, Bill... btw, do you have any
> clue what the difference is? Could you possibly
> explain to me why anyone would need to use an
> arcsin function?
>
> I noticed that you dropped the subject of:
> > Geez, you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!
> Busted your huevos thoroughly on that one!
> __
> Steve
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:vHTJe.780$FV1.762@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com. ..
> Any idea where I could find one?
just follow a loser named stephen cowell around, youre bound to end up at
one. :-)
>> the engineers who wrote the manual clearly stated to check below the
>> suspected leak because refrigerant _falls_. :-)
>
> Limitations! You don't have a clue!
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response, nate"
.....yeah, no ----!
> I'm flattered!
TRANSLATION --> "im stump stupid, nate" :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EYTJe.784$FV1.85@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com.. .
> What else would
> you have to add to this erudite discussion, Nate?
that youre stump stupid and a pathalogical liar. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:EYTJe.784$FV1.85@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com.. .
> What else would
> you have to add to this erudite discussion, Nate?
that youre stump stupid and a pathalogical liar. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EYTJe.784$FV1.85@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com.. .
> What else would
> you have to add to this erudite discussion, Nate?
that youre stump stupid and a pathalogical liar. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:EYTJe.784$FV1.85@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com.. .
> What else would
> you have to add to this erudite discussion, Nate?
that youre stump stupid and a pathalogical liar. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EYTJe.784$FV1.85@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com.. .
> What else would
> you have to add to this erudite discussion, Nate?
that youre stump stupid and a pathalogical liar. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:EYTJe.784$FV1.85@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com.. .
> What else would
> you have to add to this erudite discussion, Nate?
that youre stump stupid and a pathalogical liar. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
