'04 ZJ opinions/experience
Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0
Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? Thanx :) |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I
know none have any problems. None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" control arm modification. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Al J wrote: > > Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 > Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs > I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? > I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel > filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link > rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper > link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or > just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An > '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? > > Thanx :) |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I
know none have any problems. None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" control arm modification. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Al J wrote: > > Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 > Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs > I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? > I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel > filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link > rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper > link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or > just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An > '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? > > Thanx :) |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I
know none have any problems. None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" control arm modification. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Al J wrote: > > Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 > Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs > I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? > I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel > filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link > rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper > link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or > just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An > '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? > > Thanx :) |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
WJs off-road
http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:44AC55DD.237AECC7@cox.net... > The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I > know none have any problems. > None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" > control arm modification. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Al J wrote: >> >> Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 >> Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs >> I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? >> I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel >> filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link >> rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper >> link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or >> just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An >> '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? >> >> Thanx :) |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
WJs off-road
http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:44AC55DD.237AECC7@cox.net... > The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I > know none have any problems. > None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" > control arm modification. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Al J wrote: >> >> Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 >> Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs >> I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? >> I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel >> filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link >> rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper >> link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or >> just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An >> '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? >> >> Thanx :) |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
WJs off-road
http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:44AC55DD.237AECC7@cox.net... > The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I > know none have any problems. > None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" > control arm modification. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Al J wrote: >> >> Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 >> Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs >> I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? >> I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel >> filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link >> rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper >> link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or >> just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An >> '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? >> >> Thanx :) |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
I could have backed off a rock and staged my '89 Thunderbird to
look more capable. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ billy ray wrote: > > WJs off-road > > http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
I could have backed off a rock and staged my '89 Thunderbird to
look more capable. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ billy ray wrote: > > WJs off-road > > http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
I could have backed off a rock and staged my '89 Thunderbird to
look more capable. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ billy ray wrote: > > WJs off-road > > http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
Thanks, that would explain why a search for '04 ZJ problems' turned up
very little. We use our '97 ZJ for light duty towing, both boats and snowmobiles and rarely go farther offroad than an occasional fireroad or out on a frozen lake. I just don't care for all the changes on the new ones and the Liberty just seems too cramped and I rarely see one pass me at 70+. Our '97 ZJ has 75K miles on it, is 10 years old and an '04 WJ seems like a good last chance. The revised rear upper control arm setup made me wonder if it was the fix for all the problems with rear axle carrier bearings, since this would seem to take some of the loading off the axle tube to differential case. The new Liberty's have a similar setup, which made me wonder if DC was just sharing parts to save $$$ ;-) In article <44AC55DD.237AECC7@cox.net>, ----------@cox.net says... > The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I > know none have any problems. > None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" > control arm modification. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Al J wrote: > > > > Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 > > Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs > > I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? > > I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel > > filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link > > rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper > > link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or > > just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An > > '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? > > > > Thanx :) > |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
Thanks, that would explain why a search for '04 ZJ problems' turned up
very little. We use our '97 ZJ for light duty towing, both boats and snowmobiles and rarely go farther offroad than an occasional fireroad or out on a frozen lake. I just don't care for all the changes on the new ones and the Liberty just seems too cramped and I rarely see one pass me at 70+. Our '97 ZJ has 75K miles on it, is 10 years old and an '04 WJ seems like a good last chance. The revised rear upper control arm setup made me wonder if it was the fix for all the problems with rear axle carrier bearings, since this would seem to take some of the loading off the axle tube to differential case. The new Liberty's have a similar setup, which made me wonder if DC was just sharing parts to save $$$ ;-) In article <44AC55DD.237AECC7@cox.net>, ----------@cox.net says... > The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I > know none have any problems. > None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" > control arm modification. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Al J wrote: > > > > Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 > > Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs > > I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? > > I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel > > filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link > > rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper > > link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or > > just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An > > '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? > > > > Thanx :) > |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
Thanks, that would explain why a search for '04 ZJ problems' turned up
very little. We use our '97 ZJ for light duty towing, both boats and snowmobiles and rarely go farther offroad than an occasional fireroad or out on a frozen lake. I just don't care for all the changes on the new ones and the Liberty just seems too cramped and I rarely see one pass me at 70+. Our '97 ZJ has 75K miles on it, is 10 years old and an '04 WJ seems like a good last chance. The revised rear upper control arm setup made me wonder if it was the fix for all the problems with rear axle carrier bearings, since this would seem to take some of the loading off the axle tube to differential case. The new Liberty's have a similar setup, which made me wonder if DC was just sharing parts to save $$$ ;-) In article <44AC55DD.237AECC7@cox.net>, ----------@cox.net says... > The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I > know none have any problems. > None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" > control arm modification. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Al J wrote: > > > > Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 > > Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs > > I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? > > I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel > > filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link > > rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper > > link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or > > just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An > > '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? > > > > Thanx :) > |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
"Al J" <ajsmail@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1f1800dff5cfc6529898ab@news.xnet.com... > > The revised rear upper control arm setup made me wonder if it was the > fix for all the problems with rear axle carrier bearings, since this > would seem to take some of the loading off the axle tube to differential > case. The new Liberty's have a similar setup, which made me wonder if DC > was just sharing parts to save $$$ ;-) Weight load is still on the axle tubes, the links only serve to locate the axles, the load is taken by the springs. |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
"Al J" <ajsmail@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1f1800dff5cfc6529898ab@news.xnet.com... > > The revised rear upper control arm setup made me wonder if it was the > fix for all the problems with rear axle carrier bearings, since this > would seem to take some of the loading off the axle tube to differential > case. The new Liberty's have a similar setup, which made me wonder if DC > was just sharing parts to save $$$ ;-) Weight load is still on the axle tubes, the links only serve to locate the axles, the load is taken by the springs. |
Re: '04 ZJ opinions/experience
"Al J" <ajsmail@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1f1800dff5cfc6529898ab@news.xnet.com... > > The revised rear upper control arm setup made me wonder if it was the > fix for all the problems with rear axle carrier bearings, since this > would seem to take some of the loading off the axle tube to differential > case. The new Liberty's have a similar setup, which made me wonder if DC > was just sharing parts to save $$$ ;-) Weight load is still on the axle tubes, the links only serve to locate the axles, the load is taken by the springs. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands