Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
> Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
> stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
> >Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com :
>
> >> No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> >> mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> >> on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
> >
> >Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
>
> It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
> fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
>
> Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
> married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you can
> marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
> specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
> marriage?

I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.

End of story really.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
> Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
> stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
> >Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com :
>
> >> No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> >> mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> >> on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
> >
> >Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
>
> It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
> fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
>
> Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
> married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you can
> marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
> specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
> marriage?

I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.

End of story really.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
> Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
> stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and told
> this tale in alt.atheism
>
> >Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
> >news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com :
>
> >> No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
> >> mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction, based
> >> on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
> >
> >Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
>
> It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
> fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
>
> Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
> married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you can
> marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
> specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
> marriage?

I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.

End of story really.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

Southside of Scotland wrote:
| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
| news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
|| Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
|| stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and
|| told this tale in alt.atheism
||
||| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
||| news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
||
|||| No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
|||| mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction,
|||| based on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
|||
||| Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
||
|| It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
|| fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
||
|| Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
|| married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you
|| can marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
|| specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
|| marriage?
|
| I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
| obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
| that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
| who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
| MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
| will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.
|
| End of story really.

How should they decide which poof gets given away?

--
Gazwad

Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

Southside of Scotland wrote:
| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
| news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
|| Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
|| stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and
|| told this tale in alt.atheism
||
||| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
||| news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
||
|||| No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
|||| mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction,
|||| based on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
|||
||| Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
||
|| It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
|| fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
||
|| Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
|| married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you
|| can marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
|| specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
|| marriage?
|
| I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
| obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
| that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
| who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
| MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
| will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.
|
| End of story really.

How should they decide which poof gets given away?

--
Gazwad

Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

Southside of Scotland wrote:
| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
| news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
|| Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
|| stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and
|| told this tale in alt.atheism
||
||| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
||| news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
||
|||| No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
|||| mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction,
|||| based on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
|||
||| Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
||
|| It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
|| fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
||
|| Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
|| married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you
|| can marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
|| specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
|| marriage?
|
| I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
| obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
| that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
| who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
| MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
| will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.
|
| End of story really.

How should they decide which poof gets given away?

--
Gazwad

Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

Southside of Scotland wrote:
| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
| news:<1vni709rqhj3upql96p3mi32e8sfks8pd3@4ax.com>. ..
|| Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC), a
|| stranger called by some Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> came forth and
|| told this tale in alt.atheism
||
||| Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
||| news:j33g70tv1ht94n3q5fl5ngiheoj1opci8j@4ax.com:
||
|||| No, you state that gays can already get married (infering that you
|||| mean to members of the opposite ---.) This sort of restriction,
|||| based on race, was struck down by the Supreme Court.
|||
||| Yet sexual behavior has nothing to do with race.
||
|| It's called precident. The precident has been set that marriage is a
|| fundamental civil right, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.
||
|| Sterile people can get married. Prisoners on death row can get
|| married. People in their 90s can get married. In three states you
|| can marry a 12 year old girl with her parent's permission. Tell me,
|| specifically, how same---- marriage will harm the institution of
|| marriage?
|
| I'm surprised that you haven't figured it out yet. It's fairly
| obvious, from the lack of replies to your questions on the subject,
| that (and I'll type this nice and big so that the ignorant amongst us,
| who cannot be bothered to answer the questions asked of them) SAME ---
| MARRIAGE WILL IN NO WAY (that any reasonable person with half a brain
| will know) HARM THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.
|
| End of story really.

How should they decide which poof gets given away?

--
Gazwad

Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:

> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
> >>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>
> >> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> > These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>
> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>
Things like this:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php

There are a lot more, but I made my point.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:

> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
> >>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>
> >> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> > These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>
> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>
Things like this:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php

There are a lot more, but I made my point.

Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
 

In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:

> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
> >>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>
> >> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> > These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>
> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>
Things like this:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php

There are a lot more, but I made my point.