|
[OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
8D
Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking futs! One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints on the passenger side panic bar. Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall tire festooned smogbomb. Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter hood. Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ -- DougW |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth
dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup charter violation. Earle "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... > 8D > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking futs! > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > on the passenger side panic bar. > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > tire festooned smogbomb. > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > hood. > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > > -- > DougW > > > |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth
dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup charter violation. Earle "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... > 8D > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking futs! > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > on the passenger side panic bar. > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > tire festooned smogbomb. > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > hood. > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > > -- > DougW > > > |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth
dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup charter violation. Earle "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... > 8D > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking futs! > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > on the passenger side panic bar. > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > tire festooned smogbomb. > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > hood. > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > > -- > DougW > > > |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-)
Earle Horton wrote: > Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth > dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup > charter violation. > > Earle > > "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message > news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... > > 8D > > > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking > futs! > > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > > on the passenger side panic bar. > > > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > > tire festooned smogbomb. > > > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > > hood. > > > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > > > > -- > > DougW > > > > > > |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-)
Earle Horton wrote: > Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth > dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup > charter violation. > > Earle > > "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message > news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... > > 8D > > > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking > futs! > > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > > on the passenger side panic bar. > > > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > > tire festooned smogbomb. > > > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > > hood. > > > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > > > > -- > > DougW > > > > > > |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-)
Earle Horton wrote: > Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth > dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup > charter violation. > > Earle > > "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message > news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... > > 8D > > > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking > futs! > > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > > on the passenger side panic bar. > > > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > > tire festooned smogbomb. > > > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > > hood. > > > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > > > > -- > > DougW > > > > > > |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
On 27 Jan 2006 05:55:41 -0800, "Pop-N-Fresh"
<linux.server@charter.net> wrote: >not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > MAYBE he was referring to HIS thinking back to his high school dayz ....? <G> >Earle Horton wrote: >> Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >> dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >> charter violation. >> >> Earle >> >> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message >> news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... >> > 8D >> > >> > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing >> > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. >> > >> > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. >> > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a >> > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very >> > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp >> > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking >> > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) >> > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking >> futs! >> > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints >> > on the passenger side panic bar. >> > >> > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. >> > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. >> > >> > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting >> > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall >> > tire festooned smogbomb. >> > >> > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. >> > >> > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the >> > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter >> > hood. >> > >> > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ >> > >> > -- >> > DougW >> > >> > >> > |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
On 27 Jan 2006 05:55:41 -0800, "Pop-N-Fresh"
<linux.server@charter.net> wrote: >not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > MAYBE he was referring to HIS thinking back to his high school dayz ....? <G> >Earle Horton wrote: >> Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >> dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >> charter violation. >> >> Earle >> >> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message >> news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... >> > 8D >> > >> > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing >> > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. >> > >> > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. >> > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a >> > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very >> > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp >> > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking >> > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) >> > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking >> futs! >> > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints >> > on the passenger side panic bar. >> > >> > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. >> > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. >> > >> > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting >> > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall >> > tire festooned smogbomb. >> > >> > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. >> > >> > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the >> > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter >> > hood. >> > >> > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ >> > >> > -- >> > DougW >> > >> > >> > |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
On 27 Jan 2006 05:55:41 -0800, "Pop-N-Fresh"
<linux.server@charter.net> wrote: >not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > MAYBE he was referring to HIS thinking back to his high school dayz ....? <G> >Earle Horton wrote: >> Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >> dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >> charter violation. >> >> Earle >> >> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message >> news:MieCf.16375$bF.7038@dukeread07... >> > 8D >> > >> > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing >> > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. >> > >> > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. >> > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a >> > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very >> > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp >> > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking >> > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) >> > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking >> futs! >> > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints >> > on the passenger side panic bar. >> > >> > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. >> > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. >> > >> > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting >> > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall >> > tire festooned smogbomb. >> > >> > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. >> > >> > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the >> > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter >> > hood. >> > >> > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ >> > >> > -- >> > DougW >> > >> > >> > |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
if u like the charger... look at the challenger.. its a concept that
might come out in 08 again. its a 6.1 l hemi 2 door and looks sick |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
if u like the charger... look at the challenger.. its a concept that
might come out in 08 again. its a 6.1 l hemi 2 door and looks sick |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
if u like the charger... look at the challenger.. its a concept that
might come out in 08 again. its a 6.1 l hemi 2 door and looks sick |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
DougW proclaimed:
> 8D > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking futs! > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > on the passenger side panic bar. > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > tire festooned smogbomb. > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > hood. > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > Hopefully they'll have the Challenger out soon. Plus we will presume you also tried the Grand Cherokee SRT8 to see if you truly could get a patch with all 4 tires at once. I wouldn't want one, but it is a nice hot street truck. |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
DougW proclaimed:
> 8D > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking futs! > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > on the passenger side panic bar. > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > tire festooned smogbomb. > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > hood. > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > Hopefully they'll have the Challenger out soon. Plus we will presume you also tried the Grand Cherokee SRT8 to see if you truly could get a patch with all 4 tires at once. I wouldn't want one, but it is a nice hot street truck. |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
DougW proclaimed:
> 8D > > Stopped by the Dodge dealer to get a cheapo oil change prior to doing > another later next month. Run some of the crudbunnies out. > > So having some time to kill I start looking at the Magnum and Charger. > Talked to the salesman, one thing lead to the other and I'm off on a > test drive. The Charger has that Hemi MDS like the Jeep but was very > smooth on the streets and had only a teeny hesitation off the on-ramp > with smooooooth power all the way to 120mph and very good breaking > as it got to 120 about 200ft away from the off-ramp. :) > The MagnumSRT (even being a heavy station-wagon) was just plain nucking futs! > One thing for sure, they both left a smile on my face and fingerprints > on the passenger side panic bar. > > Trunk on the Charger is HUGE, we're talking four dead bodies at least. > And the window isn't as high up there as the Chrysler 300 C. > > The Magnum, I dunno.. it's a >station wagon< and I keep getting > flashbacks to a baby ---- brown, wood grained, chrome trimmed, whitewall > tire festooned smogbomb. > > Both have the battery in the back and loads of goodies. > > I just can't get over how large the Charger is.. it's about the > size of my old Mercury Grand Marquis, with maybe a slightly shorter > hood. > > Wanted to try the Charger R/T but they didn't have one. :/ > Hopefully they'll have the Challenger out soon. Plus we will presume you also tried the Grand Cherokee SRT8 to see if you truly could get a patch with all 4 tires at once. I wouldn't want one, but it is a nice hot street truck. |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
Lon did pass the time by typing:
> Hopefully they'll have the Challenger out soon. Yea, I've been googling on that. > Plus we will presume you also tried the Grand Cherokee SRT8 to see if > you truly could get a patch with all 4 tires at once. I wouldn't want > one, but it is a nice hot street truck. Haven't had the opportunity yet. But I will if they let me. Heck, the local 4WD crowd thought I was nuts taking a new 93 ZJ on the offroad trails. It's only plastic and metal, and most of it pops right back on. :) -- DougW |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
Lon did pass the time by typing:
> Hopefully they'll have the Challenger out soon. Yea, I've been googling on that. > Plus we will presume you also tried the Grand Cherokee SRT8 to see if > you truly could get a patch with all 4 tires at once. I wouldn't want > one, but it is a nice hot street truck. Haven't had the opportunity yet. But I will if they let me. Heck, the local 4WD crowd thought I was nuts taking a new 93 ZJ on the offroad trails. It's only plastic and metal, and most of it pops right back on. :) -- DougW |
Re: [OT] Dodge Magnum SRT
Lon did pass the time by typing:
> Hopefully they'll have the Challenger out soon. Yea, I've been googling on that. > Plus we will presume you also tried the Grand Cherokee SRT8 to see if > you truly could get a patch with all 4 tires at once. I wouldn't want > one, but it is a nice hot street truck. Haven't had the opportunity yet. But I will if they let me. Heck, the local 4WD crowd thought I was nuts taking a new 93 ZJ on the offroad trails. It's only plastic and metal, and most of it pops right back on. :) -- DougW |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is
violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. -- jeff Pop-N-Fresh wrote: > not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > > Earle Horton wrote: > >>Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >>dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >>charter violation. >> >>Earle |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is
violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. -- jeff Pop-N-Fresh wrote: > not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > > Earle Horton wrote: > >>Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >>dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >>charter violation. >> >>Earle |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is
violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. -- jeff Pop-N-Fresh wrote: > not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > > Earle Horton wrote: > >>Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >>dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >>charter violation. >> >>Earle |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
I have never reported even blatant spam if there's an "Off Topic"
warning in the subject line, after that statement it's up to the reader as to whether they want waste their time reading it or not. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ jeff wrote: > > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. > > -- > jeff |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
I have never reported even blatant spam if there's an "Off Topic"
warning in the subject line, after that statement it's up to the reader as to whether they want waste their time reading it or not. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ jeff wrote: > > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. > > -- > jeff |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
I have never reported even blatant spam if there's an "Off Topic"
warning in the subject line, after that statement it's up to the reader as to whether they want waste their time reading it or not. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ jeff wrote: > > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. > > -- > jeff |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
Would that be a worse felony than top posting with a wasted .sig line
that has nothing more useful than your name in it.... such that anyone following up with a compliant newsreader would find all of the older content chopped off unless that .sig is corrupted by adding three dots or similar to it? Call the posting police!!! jeff proclaimed: > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. > > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of > ignorance. -- ... jeff Pop-N-Fresh wrote: > not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > > Earle Horton wrote: > >> Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >> dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >> charter violation. >> >> Earle |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
Would that be a worse felony than top posting with a wasted .sig line
that has nothing more useful than your name in it.... such that anyone following up with a compliant newsreader would find all of the older content chopped off unless that .sig is corrupted by adding three dots or similar to it? Call the posting police!!! jeff proclaimed: > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. > > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of > ignorance. -- ... jeff Pop-N-Fresh wrote: > not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > > Earle Horton wrote: > >> Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >> dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >> charter violation. >> >> Earle |
Re: Dodge Magnum SRT
Would that be a worse felony than top posting with a wasted .sig line
that has nothing more useful than your name in it.... such that anyone following up with a compliant newsreader would find all of the older content chopped off unless that .sig is corrupted by adding three dots or similar to it? Call the posting police!!! jeff proclaimed: > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of ignorance. > > I disagree. Putting OT in front is an open admission that one is > violating the charter of the newsgroup. This, to my thinking is worse > than someone who blunders in with something off topic out of > ignorance. -- ... jeff Pop-N-Fresh wrote: > not really a violation he put OT in the subject :-) > > Earle Horton wrote: > >> Thanks. You got me thinking of the original Bo and Luke, and that Plymouth >> dealer I used to walk by on the way to high school. Definitely a newsgroup >> charter violation. >> >> Earle |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands